10 Differences Between OWS and The Tea Party

 

 
The media is having a field day when it comes to reporting on Occupy Wall Street (OWS).  Presented with a neat and clean narrative that they can hysterically massage into a controversy, they’ve delightfully contrasted Occupy Wall Street with the Tea Party protests. To hear lazy reporters talk, one would think that the hundreds of thousands of OWS protestors across the world could be easily compared to the relatively tiny Tea Party movement that’s despised abroad and is generally unpopular even in the US.  While they share the common vein of being angry at the current system and the direction the country is heading, most of the similarities end there.   
 

Grassroots Vs. Astroturf

 

 

Image Source

  
 
While Tea Party members criticize Occupy Wall Street for not taking the initiative, finding a job, and bettering the system, the statement is hilariously hypocritical. Tea Party members didn’t really do anything on their own; they were funded by large, corporate political organizations. For example, FreedomWorks, an organization which received $12 million from the Koch foundations, was largely behind starting the Tea Party movement. The Koch family is accused of using the Tea Party to execute their own conservative agenda, and have given millions and millions of dollars to conservative causes and institutions which have, in turn, funded the Tea Party.  Now, of course, the thousands that eventually turned out for the Tea Party protests were motivated by a genuine desire to change a system they viewed as heading in the wrong direction, there’s no getting around the fact that they had a metric buttload of seed capital to start up, not to mention their own news network.  Occupy Wall Street started out with a handful of people and Facebook.  Even the Unions, the great boogeymen of the Right, didn’t get behind the protests until they were well advanced.  Occupy Wall Street is grass the grew naturally from the people’s anger and frustration.  The Tea Party is grass that grew on a well-manicured lawn with several tons of horseshit (for fertilizer). 
 

Representation

 

 

Image Source

 
While the claim by Occupy Wall Street protestors that they represent “The 99%” of this country is a little bit audacious, insisting that the rich pay more than the middle class in taxes and quit mucking around with elections is actually pretty well in line with the interests of about 99% of the country.  Most of us don’t have the power to buy elections, most of us don’t get the majority of our income from capital gains, and most of us make well under the $350,000 salaries that the 1% do.  Regardless of your position on government intervention in the economy and programs like Obamacare, they are designed to help the majority of Americans.  Whereas take a look at the six principals of the Tea Party Express–widely considered the largest and most influential branch of the Tea Party.  While a lot of these look good on paper (who doesn’t like lower taxes?) the beneficiaries will be disproportionately laughing from their yachts atop piles of money.  Where Occupy Wall Street argues for policies that will hopefully help large majorities of the population, the Tea Party is busy pressuring representatives to cut off people’s unemployment and disaster relief for victims of a hurricane and an earthquake.    

Age

 

 

Image Source

 
While the Tea Party movement and OWS actually have a lot of similarities in principle once you get past the shrillness, one of the biggest differences between the two is the yawning age gap between participants.  Only 10% of Tea Partiers are under the age of 34, and most are over the age of 45.  OWS on the other hand has a much younger profile, but 35% of them are still over the age of 34.  This is a generational struggle, there’s no denying that, but OWS represents a much more even slice of the population, and doesn’t just seem to be older people holding up bafflingly offensive signs like this. 

Popular Support

 

 

Image Source

 
Despite some people’s attempt to make OWS look like a bunch of entitled, unemployed hippies who hate capitalism, America and Grandma’s apple pie, apparently a lot of Americans aren’t buying it.  Favorable opinions of the OWS keep creeping toward the majority, while favorable opinions of the tea party still struggle to stay above the percentage of people who think they’re mean and creepy.  But looking past the movements themselves, policies that are generally supported by OWS—such as better regulation, a more progressive tax system, and no more bank bailouts—enjoy resounding support in the 60%-70% range.  To put into perspective just how rare it is that 60% of Americans will agree on even anything, 73% of Americans agree the super rich should pay more in taxes while only 58% believe Obama wasn’t born in Kenya, by a margin of 15%.  And that includes 66% of Republicans.  It’s not 99% by a long shot, but in American politics it’s as rare as Rick Perry making sense

OWS Actually Protests

 

 

Image Source

 
A quick primer on non-violent resistance.  It’s spiritual fathers are widely considered to be historical characters such as Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau.  All three of these people advocated civil disobedience, which basically involves breaking the law in a non-violent manner and peacefully going to jail for your crimes.  In a word, the whole point is to break the law in a peaceful manner to draw attention to your cause—usually because of the disproportionately violent crackdown from the government.  Otherwise, your protest is little more than a louder, more annoying bumper sticker. 

Hundreds, if not thousands of protesters have been arrested during Occupy protests, often as the result of some pretty shady actions on the part of the Police.  Not to mention the peaceful protesters who were pepper sprayed or seriously injured by overzealous police forces.  It’s obviously important to note that breaking the law and fostering mayhem aren’t good in and of themselves, but when a system is so broken that people feel like they’re only way to get noticed is to block traffic on the Brooklyn bridge, that’s a real protest.  That’s being mad as hell and not taking it anymore, despite the fact that you might get tear gassed and shot with rubber bullets without warning. 

OWS Are Not Unemployed

 

 

Image Source

 
Anyone who has been to an OWS protest know that there are usually quite a lot of unemployed people in the crowd.  There’s two ways to spin this, one is that they’re lazy, shiftless hippies demanding government handouts.  The other is that they’ve been screwed over by a system designed to benefit the rich and bend the middle class over a chair.  Or you could not bother spinning it at all because 70% of OWS protesters are employed.  That’s in contrast to only 56% of Tea Partiers who have jobs.  To be fair, those 44% of Tea Partiers that are unemployed are most likely retired.  Though it’s hard to entertain calls for a smaller government and critiques of OWS being lazy, Unemployment-collecting ruffians from a group of people collecting gob-smacking amounts of money (close to $1 trillion a year) in Social Security and Medicare.  Especially when the people paying for those programs are the 70% employed younger people at the OWS protests.   

OWS is Better-Educated

 

 

Image Source

 
While it’s unfair to correlate intelligence with level of education, it’s certainly interesting to see the breakdown of education between OWS and the Tea Party.  A staggering 92% of OWS protesters have college degrees, in contrast to 70% for the Tea Party.  Again, like employment, this is likely the result of a generational gap rather than OWS attracting more college-educated people.  When many in the Tea Party demographic were of college age, enrollment rates were anywhere from 10%-15% lower.  But it does illustrate an interesting fact, namely that OWS isn’t the rambling hippie caravan it’s made out to be, and is likely made up of educated young professionals who feel absolutely robbed by the system.  This is the demographic, by the way, that starts revolutions

OWS Have Numbers to Back up Their Arguments

 

 

Image Source

 
While OWS hasn’t really published an over-arching manifesto stating what they believe, and the signs at rallies can range from Libertarian to Liberal to Anarchist and everything in between, a couple of salient points have emerged as the main arguments behind the movement, the big one being:

• Rising income inequality and the lack of growth in wages for 80% of the country over the past few decades reveals a fundamental inequality between the top 10% of wage earners and the rest of us. 

Similarly, while the Tea Party is still somewhat loosely-organized, a couple of over-arching arguments have emerged, the big one being:

• LESS. TAXES. We are Taxed Enough Already.

Let’s start with the Tea Party, namely, do will lower tax rates make things better overall, and are the truly onerous right now?  The answer to both: No.  Tax rates are at their lowest point since the depression, and there’s little political will to raise them even slightly.  While there are a few tax rates such as the corporate income tax, and arguably FICA taxes, that are too high right now, federal income taxes are so low, 47% of Americans pay no federal income tax at all.  And while lowering taxes is one good way to stimulate the economy in a depression, they really don’t have much lower to go for the majority of the country, meaning that no one would end up spending more.  Plus a rise in taxes will almost certainly be needed to balance the budget, and economists have shown that raising taxes leads to greater economic growth (or to be more precise, slightly less slower) than spending cuts.

Turning to OWS, is there systemic inequality emerging in America, not just in wages, but in people’s ability to increase their wages and advance?  In a word: Yes.  It’s a well-studied fact that the middle class has been shrinking, and wages for everyone who isn’t a millionaire have stagnated since Reagan.  Essentially, the rich have been getting progressively richer, while the poor and middle class have been getting poorer.  And they have been using this wealth to game the everloving shit out of the system to further increase their wealth, oh and to buy politicians left and right using a variety of shady methods

Income

 

 

Image Source

 
When it comes to income, the Tea Party has the OWS protesters walloped.  Only 13% of the Tea Party makes less than $50,000 a year, and 31% earn over $75,000 a year.  OWS on the other hand, is 66% made up of people earning less than $50,000 a year.  Again, this is probably the result of a generational gap, as one of the surest guarantees of finding higher earners is to go up in age.  Unfortunately, this is not helping the Tea Partier’s arguments when they’ve enjoyed decades of a growing economy, accumulated some wealth, and now seem to barely care that the cost of college is hovering somewhere out by Pluto.  Of course the vast, vast majority of Tea Partiers earnestly think that lowering taxes and shrinking government will be to the benefit of all.  However, to the younger OWS protesters who are now forced to struggle in the bedlam left behind, “Taxed enough already” and “End Obamacare” sound like poorly-translated versions of “Fuck You. Got Mine.”    

Redistribution and Hypocrisy

 

 

Image Source

 
Between 1984 and 2009, the average net worth of Americans under 35 declined by 68%.  At the same time, net worth for those over the age of 65 increased by 42%.  There are a variety of causes for this, not the least of which being that the younger you get, the more minority and single-parenty you get.  Also the collapses of the early 90s, 2000s and in 2008 haven’t helped.  But one of the biggest is the fact that all young employed Americans pay a payroll tax, which goes directly to the older generation in the form of medicare and social security benefits, to the tune of about $1 trillion a year, as mentioned earlier.  Oh and in case anyone forgot, the Tea Party formed around outrage at Obamacare, also known as a program that would give the young and middle-aged the same benefits as Medicare.

To put it plainly, OWS is paying and the Tea Party is collecting, and then the Tea Party is complaining about the taxes while reaping the benefits and furiously denying them to others.   Especially in this light, it’s no wonder that OWS has ballooned, one of its largest protests so far in Oakland has grown to well over 100,000 people.

  • rjs

    for the record…

    Most “Occupy” Protesters HAVE Jobs … Unemployment Much Lower Than In Tea Party –

    Wall Street Journal found: The vast majority of demonstrators are actually employed, and the proportion of protesters unemployed (15%) is within single digits of the national unemployment rate (9.1%) In contrast, a 2010 New York Times CBS News poll found that only 56% of members of the Tea party were employed (question 105).

    http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/most-occupy-protesters-have-jobs.html

  • chris

    I have a hard time calling ows grass roots considering it was started by a Canadian anti capitalist group… plus there are several p.r. firms handling the ows business.

  • Geoff

    You forgot to mention all the millions of dollars the OWS is costing America to clean up their protests, and all the damage the protesters cause to small businesses who refuse to give them free food or let them bathe in their private bathroom facilities. But that isn’t important because they don’t feel entitled.

  • GW

    Nice try. No original sourcing. Plus, your last Oakland citing from non-original source, Huffington Post, talks about violence from the Occupy peeps. Occupiers are leeches on society who have no idea how the business world works. They want hand-outs, free health care, and no taxes at the expense of the doers in this country. Fail!

  • Aaron

    “Taxed Enough Already” is an easy target. I have two friends who told me (I’m a libertarian TEA partier) that tax cuts are unsustainable.

    I can’t agree more. Tax cuts, considering the direction we are headed, are completely unsustainable.

    However, Taxes are only the accidental focus of the TEA party.

    Yes we DO think the corporate income tax is high (you don’t seem to argue). Yes we DO think income tax rates (for the 47% who pay taxes) are too high. More, we DO think the tax system itself is a monster. That’s why there are several tax law proposals out right now to completely get rid of it.

    SPENDING, though, is the main concern.

    This is partly what OWS is concerned with. The bailouts of banks and large corporations “too big to fail” is an OUTRAGE for any American, especially ones who would identify themselves as capitalist. Government favor to any business is disingenuous to a free market economy. It would have hurt for those banks to fail, but the answer was not to prop them up on our backs, as I’m sure you’d agree.

    So, how do taxes even factor in? Admittedly, the name TEA party has quite a bit to do with TAXES.

    *Any amount of spending the government does WILL BECOME A TAX. The point is for washington to stop SPENDING unnecessarily so that they won’t have to TAX unnecessarily because…we are TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY.*

    What’s been so interesting to see is OWS bearing the same grievances (in large part) as the TEA party.

    Neither side trusts the system we have (at least as it’s working), but while the TEA party suggests an approach that restrains government, and likewise corporate influence upon it, OWS by and large suggests an approach that extends government influence.

    Which seems more sustainable?

    I’ll be the first to admit – less government influence puts much more personal responsibility upon my own shoulders, but I will GLADLY trade that responsibility for freedom.

    I simply don’t trust government to look out for ANY of us as well as we can ourselves. I’ve long said that I’m absolutely for private entities promoting social justice. Conservatives and libertarians alike do NOT pretend that social justice should be pushed aside. We simply believe the most effective and compassionate ones able to handle it are us. People. Not government.

    Let’s figure out where we agree so we can find sustainable solutions to these very real problems.

    -I am in the 10% of TEA partiers under 35, the 70% who are college-educated, the 56% who are employed, and the 13% making less than $50k/year.

  • Fred

    Some valid points, but horribly biased article.

  • kenbo666

    WoW. WORST ANALYSIS OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TEA PART AND OWS EVAR!

    Apologize much?

    I believe you got it wrong on all counts.

    GEOGRE SOROS! I’d really like to know who it feeding the OWS and giving them all these really nice tents? Also who’s paying for their AtnT bills so they can FACEBOOK from the Front!

    I’m getting sick and tired of liberal biased media trying to make these miscreants look like good and proper upstanding citizens.

    Citizens do not:
    1. Trespass.
    2. Loiter
    3. Rape
    4. Murder
    5. Destroy private property
    6. Physically attack authority

    They have no coheritent idea or story. They can’t even provide a good course of action. If you want to change things try working in the system.

    TEa Party figured that out from the git-go.

  • rjs

    what a humorless bunch of naysayers; it must be time for a teach-in…

    http://marketwatch666.blogspot.com/2011/11/occupy-la-teach-in.html