Comments on: 20 Animals That Have Been Cloned http://www.businesspundit.com/20-animals-that-have-been-cloned/ Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:09:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Nathan http://www.businesspundit.com/20-animals-that-have-been-cloned/comment-page-3/#comment-32309 Nathan Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:56:32 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=8863#comment-32309 ha ha

]]> By: guyblow http://www.businesspundit.com/20-animals-that-have-been-cloned/comment-page-3/#comment-32294 guyblow Mon, 04 Apr 2011 04:00:41 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=8863#comment-32294 monkey* monkey*

]]> By: guyblow http://www.businesspundit.com/20-animals-that-have-been-cloned/comment-page-3/#comment-32293 guyblow Mon, 04 Apr 2011 03:59:58 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=8863#comment-32293 i'll bet that likes boys... the horrors of cloning. i’ll bet that likes boys… the horrors of cloning.

]]> By: Marilyn http://www.businesspundit.com/20-animals-that-have-been-cloned/comment-page-3/#comment-32185 Marilyn Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:53:19 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=8863#comment-32185 I am doing a presentation on the cloning debate, and can understand everyones points of view, just hope they dont do the cloning of some adults especially one of my tutors lol I am doing a presentation on the cloning debate, and can understand everyones points of view, just hope they dont do the cloning of some adults especially one of my tutors lol

]]> By: Nathan http://www.businesspundit.com/20-animals-that-have-been-cloned/comment-page-2/#comment-31968 Nathan Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:44:32 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=8863#comment-31968 I think it’s amazing how ignorant not just atheist can be but a lot of you people on this site can be. Some of you people don’t realize what good has come out of all gene modification. I’m in no way insulting atheism or any other religion, or anybody. I’m sorry if it comes across this way. Everyone is entitled to believe in whatever it is they want. I just want to let y’all know that by the discoveries that could come out of this. Open your minds people. For example. Maybe one day they would have to technology to actually save a person 100% from death. No waiting or guessing. A 100% chance that they can let that person just live a little longer to either see his children grow up or to live his life. God created the animals to be ruled by humans. Genesis 1: 24-31, The sixth day: God said: I command the earth to give life to all kinds of tame animals, wild animals, and reptiles, .” and that’s what happened. God made every one of them. Then he looked at what he had done and it was good. God said, “Now we will make humans, and they will be like us. We will let them rule the fish, the birds, and all other living creatures. So God created humans to be like himself. He made men and women. God gave them his blessing and said have a lot of children Fill the earth with people and bring it under your control. Rule over the fish n the ocean, the birds in the sky, and every animal on the earth. I have provided all kinds of fruit and grain for you to eat. And I have given you the green plants as food for everything else that breathes. Theses will be good for, both wild and tame, and for birds. God looked at what he had done. All fit was very good. Evening came and then mooring -that was the sixth day. Yes religion does get in the way. You people who say this is immoral. You shouldn’t use God as your argument. It isn’t right. This isn’t a question about faith. This is a question about science. And yes they are both very real. There is no just one right religion. Why do you think there are so many in this world? Every book in the bible was written by someone different. And every one of those people experience God in a different way. So therefore we experience him in a different way. The Bible has been translated many times. Stop taking the bible for the literal translation. I don’t like the idea that animals suffer. But they suffer for the better good of us. Would it be better if it was your child and not a animal? Let me tell y’all something…… WE ARE ALL ANIMALS. We do this so are children can live in a world with better technology and better medicines that have been improved. This is all for the survival of mankind. God has a reason for everything that we do. Stop being so narrow minded and except what this world is for what it is. God made it exactly how he wanted. It. That’s why Jesus died for us. So we could be saved. God is not angry. He may be disappointed. But our sins have been forever forgiven because of the ultimate sacrifice that He made for us. God is real, Science is real. We do all of this stuff to save the lives of our children. Every day children die from diseases that we know nothing about. We can stop all of that. We can give a child with no shot at life a better chance to have that shot. We can help this world and everyone in it. Isn’t that what God wanted? For us to help each other? Or do you think he just intended for us to do nothing for ourselves? Do you think he wanted us to not try to do something for us and for our own kind? Do you think that we should just stop all scientific genes or any other science projects and let everyone die from world hunger, Aids, Cancer, Heart diseases, Diabetes, HIV? Think about this. Also. I’m a freshman in high school. Even I can see what we need to do for ourselves. I think it’s amazing how ignorant not just atheist can be but a lot of you people on this site can be. Some of you people don’t realize what good has come out of all gene modification. I’m in no way insulting atheism or any other religion, or anybody. I’m sorry if it comes across this way. Everyone is entitled to believe in whatever it is they want. I just want to let y’all know that by the discoveries that could come out of this. Open your minds people. For example. Maybe one day they would have to technology to actually save a person 100% from death. No waiting or guessing. A 100% chance that they can let that person just live a little longer to either see his children grow up or to live his life. God created the animals to be ruled by humans. Genesis 1: 24-31, The sixth day: God said: I command the earth to give life to all kinds of tame animals, wild animals, and reptiles, .” and that’s what happened. God made every one of them. Then he looked at what he had done and it was good. God said, “Now we will make humans, and they will be like us. We will let them rule the fish, the birds, and all other living creatures. So God created humans to be like himself. He made men and women. God gave them his blessing and said have a lot of children Fill the earth with people and bring it under your control. Rule over the fish n the ocean, the birds in the sky, and every animal on the earth. I have provided all kinds of fruit and grain for you to eat. And I have given you the green plants as food for everything else that breathes. Theses will be good for, both wild and tame, and for birds. God looked at what he had done. All fit was very good. Evening came and then mooring -that was the sixth day. Yes religion does get in the way. You people who say this is immoral. You shouldn’t use God as your argument. It isn’t right. This isn’t a question about faith. This is a question about science. And yes they are both very real. There is no just one right religion. Why do you think there are so many in this world? Every book in the bible was written by someone different. And every one of those people experience God in a different way. So therefore we experience him in a different way. The Bible has been translated many times. Stop taking the bible for the literal translation. I don’t like the idea that animals suffer. But they suffer for the better good of us. Would it be better if it was your child and not a animal? Let me tell y’all something…… WE ARE ALL ANIMALS. We do this so are children can live in a world with better technology and better medicines that have been improved. This is all for the survival of mankind. God has a reason for everything that we do. Stop being so narrow minded and except what this world is for what it is. God made it exactly how he wanted. It. That’s why Jesus died for us. So we could be saved. God is not angry. He may be disappointed. But our sins have been forever forgiven because of the ultimate sacrifice that He made for us. God is real, Science is real. We do all of this stuff to save the lives of our children. Every day children die from diseases that we know nothing about. We can stop all of that. We can give a child with no shot at life a better chance to have that shot. We can help this world and everyone in it. Isn’t that what God wanted? For us to help each other? Or do you think he just intended for us to do nothing for ourselves? Do you think he wanted us to not try to do something for us and for our own kind? Do you think that we should just stop all scientific genes or any other science projects and let everyone die from world hunger, Aids, Cancer, Heart diseases, Diabetes, HIV? Think about this. Also. I’m a freshman in high school. Even I can see what we need to do for ourselves.

]]> By: Olivegrl232 http://www.businesspundit.com/20-animals-that-have-been-cloned/comment-page-2/#comment-31895 Olivegrl232 Thu, 10 Mar 2011 03:04:03 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=8863#comment-31895 I think cloning is definitely an interesting concept, yet I do not think humans should use it. I believe that it is not humane to clone. I believe in individuality, not copies of the same animal for human consumption. I think that meat cloning is just heartless production only for the animal to be slaughtered and eaten. I think it is an interesting development, but all creatures were made to be different. Let's not change that. I think cloning is definitely an interesting concept, yet I do not think humans should use it. I believe that it is not humane to clone. I believe in individuality, not copies of the same animal for human consumption. I think that meat cloning is just heartless production only for the animal to be slaughtered and eaten. I think it is an interesting development, but all creatures were made to be different. Let’s not change that.

]]> By: Breakd0wn http://www.businesspundit.com/20-animals-that-have-been-cloned/comment-page-2/#comment-31871 Breakd0wn Tue, 08 Mar 2011 05:35:35 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=8863#comment-31871 If we have been created in your gods' ( and I say gods cause you have such a half-ass loophole to poly and monotheistic view of your god)image and likeness, then doesn't that make us demigods? Genesis 1:26 If your gods told us to be bountiful and populate, who are you to criticize our population size? If your gods told us to rule all the creatures from the depths of the seas to the highest reaches of the sky, who are you to question our methods? Genesis 1:28 You say man is corrupt and he has no right to play god? Then who do you think wrote your precious and holy texts and who do you think has translated it from language to language? How can you believe in something when it's very fabrics are hypocritical and are full of contradiction? You say it takes more faith to believe in factual science and proven theories. I say I rather believe in what can be proven and is tangible, and you can go believe in an entity that put you on a planet that tries to kill you every chance. If we have been created in your gods’ ( and I say gods cause you have such a half-ass loophole to poly and monotheistic view of your god)image and likeness, then doesn’t that make us demigods? Genesis 1:26

If your gods told us to be bountiful and populate, who are you to criticize our population size?
If your gods told us to rule all the creatures from the depths of the seas to the highest reaches of the sky, who are you to question our methods? Genesis 1:28

You say man is corrupt and he has no right to play god? Then who do you think wrote your precious and holy texts and who do you think has translated it from language to language?

How can you believe in something when it’s very fabrics are hypocritical and are full of contradiction?

You say it takes more faith to believe in factual science and proven theories. I say I rather believe in what can be proven and is tangible, and you can go believe in an entity that put you on a planet that tries to kill you every chance.

]]> By: dusterduck http://www.businesspundit.com/20-animals-that-have-been-cloned/comment-page-2/#comment-31847 dusterduck Sun, 06 Mar 2011 09:54:39 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=8863#comment-31847 ‘Multiply-resistant Staphylococcus aureus’, aka ‘Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus’, also known as ‘Golden Staph’, resistant to usual antibiotics, are not an example of mutation (evolution). MRSA remains a germ. It has not evolved into something more complex. These “supergerms” have been artificially (albeit unintentially) bred by man in the fastidiously hygienic environment of hospitals. I agree, humans are more important than animals. But why would you even say that if we evolved from animals? What sets us apart is that we are created in God's image. Animals aren't. ‘Multiply-resistant Staphylococcus aureus’, aka ‘Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus’, also known as ‘Golden Staph’, resistant to usual antibiotics, are not an example of mutation (evolution). MRSA remains a germ. It has not evolved into something more complex. These “supergerms” have been artificially (albeit unintentially) bred by man in the fastidiously hygienic environment of hospitals.
I agree, humans are more important than animals. But why would you even say that if we evolved from animals?
What sets us apart is that we are created in God’s image. Animals aren’t.

]]> By: Think Before You Speak http://www.businesspundit.com/20-animals-that-have-been-cloned/comment-page-2/#comment-31778 Think Before You Speak Thu, 03 Mar 2011 07:11:08 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=8863#comment-31778 Ok, faith is not required in evolution due to the fact that it has been proven. If you will please take a look at a recently evolved bacteria by the name of MRSCA, or Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, which is a bateria that evolved to be resitant specifically to human made anitibiotics. As for cloning, this is a complex issue with many sides even if we do remove religion from the table. While I do agree that animals should not be needlessly injured for science or amusment, I know that the experiments that are done on animals would never pass an Ethical Review Board for experimentation on human beings. I know I am about to offend plenty of people with my next statment, but it must be said. Humans are more important than animals. End of story. If cloning animals will give us a way to extend the length of life of even one human then I say go for it. When we take a look at the number of people that starve to death each year, ("4 million will die this year." according to http://library.thinkquest.org/C002291/high/present/stats.htm) how can we be so selfish as to say that cloing food is wrong? Due to the fact that every person who has commented on this site obviously has a computer and pays money for internet each month....how can you be so selfish as to say that cloning for food is wrong? Ok, faith is not required in evolution due to the fact that it has been proven. If you will please take a look at a recently evolved bacteria by the name of MRSCA, or Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, which is a bateria that evolved to be resitant specifically to human made anitibiotics. As for cloning, this is a complex issue with many sides even if we do remove religion from the table. While I do agree that animals should not be needlessly injured for science or amusment, I know that the experiments that are done on animals would never pass an Ethical Review Board for experimentation on human beings. I know I am about to offend plenty of people with my next statment, but it must be said. Humans are more important than animals. End of story. If cloning animals will give us a way to extend the length of life of even one human then I say go for it. When we take a look at the number of people that starve to death each year, (“4 million will die this year.” according to http://library.thinkquest.org/C002291/high/present/stats.htm) how can we be so selfish as to say that cloing food is wrong? Due to the fact that every person who has commented on this site obviously has a computer and pays money for internet each month….how can you be so selfish as to say that cloning for food is wrong?

]]> By: dusterduck http://www.businesspundit.com/20-animals-that-have-been-cloned/comment-page-2/#comment-31642 dusterduck Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:31:58 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=8863#comment-31642 In genetic engineering, we're not 'creating' anything new. We're shuffling existing DNA. In all our great intelligence and autonomy, we can't even 'create' a blade of grass from scratch. We're just using existing building material. If we can use and manipulate existing resources for the good of mankind, that's something we can celebrate - there are many diseases cured or prevented today that our not so distant reles died of, eg smallpox, tetanus, pneumonia, TB. But, if we are 'creating' embryos and then destroying them, either for therapeutic or reproductive purposes, that's unethical. The end doesn't justify the means. People who don't believe in God as the creator, usually put their 'faith' in evolution and typically don't have any issue with cloning. It actually takes more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe in God. There's a world of evidence that animals reproduce after their own kind - which is what God said would happen. Not only do we have no evidence of even one species changing its DNA and becoming another species in nature, scientists can't successfully 'evolve' animals either. In genetic engineering, we’re not ‘creating’ anything new. We’re shuffling existing DNA. In all our great intelligence and autonomy, we can’t even ‘create’ a blade of grass from scratch. We’re just using existing building material. If we can use and manipulate existing resources for the good of mankind, that’s something we can celebrate – there are many diseases cured or prevented today that our not so distant reles died of, eg smallpox, tetanus, pneumonia, TB. But, if we are ‘creating’ embryos and then destroying them, either for therapeutic or reproductive purposes, that’s unethical. The end doesn’t justify the means. People who don’t believe in God as the creator, usually put their ‘faith’ in evolution and typically don’t have any issue with cloning. It actually takes more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe in God. There’s a world of evidence that animals reproduce after their own kind – which is what God said would happen. Not only do we have no evidence of even one species changing its DNA and becoming another species in nature, scientists can’t successfully ‘evolve’ animals either.

]]>