<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4/10/07 Interesting Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/41007-interesting-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/41007-interesting-links/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurence haughton</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/41007-interesting-links/comment-page-1/#comment-2177</link>
		<dc:creator>laurence haughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3124#comment-2177</guid>
		<description>I think Davenport is right to say that &quot;Most of the barriers that prevent knowledge from flowing freely in organizations – power differentials, lack of trust, missing incentives, unsupportive cultures, and the general busyness of employees today – won&#039;t be addressed or substantially changed by technology alone.&quot; In the research for my book on making speed a competitive advantage I was excited to find companies who had blown through the obstacles and &quot;let the best idea win.&quot; I was later very depressed to see that even companies who had reaped tremendous innovations from openness had allowed the door to be slammed shut by their bureaucracy.  It is a deep rooted cultural issue.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Davenport is right to say that &#8220;Most of the barriers that prevent knowledge from flowing freely in organizations – power differentials, lack of trust, missing incentives, unsupportive cultures, and the general busyness of employees today – won&#8217;t be addressed or substantially changed by technology alone.&#8221; In the research for my book on making speed a competitive advantage I was excited to find companies who had blown through the obstacles and &#8220;let the best idea win.&#8221; I was later very depressed to see that even companies who had reaped tremendous innovations from openness had allowed the door to be slammed shut by their bureaucracy.  It is a deep rooted cultural issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david foster</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/41007-interesting-links/comment-page-1/#comment-2176</link>
		<dc:creator>david foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3124#comment-2176</guid>
		<description>Decentralized decision-making is not primarily a matter of technology: it is primarily a matter of organizational design and culture. Technology can be used to support either centralization or decentralization.

Except in a very small organization, a good idea should not usually have to go &quot;all the way to the top.&quot; If innovations can normally only get done with CEO support, then the organization is too centralized.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decentralized decision-making is not primarily a matter of technology: it is primarily a matter of organizational design and culture. Technology can be used to support either centralization or decentralization.</p>
<p>Except in a very small organization, a good idea should not usually have to go &#8220;all the way to the top.&#8221; If innovations can normally only get done with CEO support, then the organization is too centralized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

