<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon Warns State of California to Back Off</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/amazon-warns-state-of-california-to-back-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/amazon-warns-state-of-california-to-back-off/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:31:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lela Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/amazon-warns-state-of-california-to-back-off/comment-page-1/#comment-15324</link>
		<dc:creator>Lela Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=12189#comment-15324</guid>
		<description>Yes, you can almost always find exactly what you&#039;re looking for on Amazon. I was recently in the same situation - looking for a book by a local author, that a local store did not carry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can almost always find exactly what you&#8217;re looking for on Amazon. I was recently in the same situation &#8211; looking for a book by a local author, that a local store did not carry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lela Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/amazon-warns-state-of-california-to-back-off/comment-page-1/#comment-15323</link>
		<dc:creator>Lela Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=12189#comment-15323</guid>
		<description>I understand the consumer is responsible for the tax, but there&#039;s really no administrative process to pay the taxes anyway. If it were a priority it seems we&#039;d have a way to do this, or it would be measured or monitored in some way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the consumer is responsible for the tax, but there&#8217;s really no administrative process to pay the taxes anyway. If it were a priority it seems we&#8217;d have a way to do this, or it would be measured or monitored in some way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/amazon-warns-state-of-california-to-back-off/comment-page-1/#comment-15318</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=12189#comment-15318</guid>
		<description>There seems to be some misunderstanding to the nature of the tax.

Sales tax is a use tax that the consumer owes to his/her state for every product they buy.  Consumers (not the merchant) owe the tax whether they purchase from a local or interstate company.  Local, in-state merchants are tasked with collection within their state of operation.  However, traditionally, it has been deemed too burdensome for merchants to collect and remit taxes for every state they do not operate in.  Consumers are under the &quot;honor system&quot; to calculate and remit use taxes for products purchased from out-of-state (and famously fail to do so).

I don&#039;t object to merchants collecting all taxes, but there needs to be some kind of standard system to handle it.  Credit card processors could add a sales tax processing and remittance services to their product line, however, receiving states (rather than merchants) should pay for the service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There seems to be some misunderstanding to the nature of the tax.</p>
<p>Sales tax is a use tax that the consumer owes to his/her state for every product they buy.  Consumers (not the merchant) owe the tax whether they purchase from a local or interstate company.  Local, in-state merchants are tasked with collection within their state of operation.  However, traditionally, it has been deemed too burdensome for merchants to collect and remit taxes for every state they do not operate in.  Consumers are under the &#8220;honor system&#8221; to calculate and remit use taxes for products purchased from out-of-state (and famously fail to do so).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t object to merchants collecting all taxes, but there needs to be some kind of standard system to handle it.  Credit card processors could add a sales tax processing and remittance services to their product line, however, receiving states (rather than merchants) should pay for the service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no_taxes_please</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/amazon-warns-state-of-california-to-back-off/comment-page-1/#comment-15317</link>
		<dc:creator>no_taxes_please</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=12189#comment-15317</guid>
		<description>I live in NY and I do buy online to avoid the sales tax. Trust me, I am paying enough already - especially considering how effectively our state government is being run. (Have you seen the news where the state senate in in this state has done nothing for three weeks because of bickering? And now it is summer recess, so time for vacation!)

One other benefit is that by not paying sales tax you can generally cancel out the shipping and handling costs. 

Fwiw I also buy things locally, but only where the total cost of the purchase would be comparable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in NY and I do buy online to avoid the sales tax. Trust me, I am paying enough already &#8211; especially considering how effectively our state government is being run. (Have you seen the news where the state senate in in this state has done nothing for three weeks because of bickering? And now it is summer recess, so time for vacation!)</p>
<p>One other benefit is that by not paying sales tax you can generally cancel out the shipping and handling costs. </p>
<p>Fwiw I also buy things locally, but only where the total cost of the purchase would be comparable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/amazon-warns-state-of-california-to-back-off/comment-page-1/#comment-15316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=12189#comment-15316</guid>
		<description>All state revenue administrators use Amazon as an excuse for declining sales tax revenues.  Whatever the sales tax savings Amazon provides to consumers is offset, if not exceeded, by the shipping changes which I see on used books to be at least 15% and sometimes even 100% of the book value.  So, the sales tax Amazon-benefit/local-burden is simply non-existent.  Then, what local services is Amazon paying for in California, North Carolina, Maryland, or any other state other than its home state?  Local bookstores receive police protection, roads to their stores, schools for its employees and their children.  FedEx receives a benefit, but they are not Amazon and they pay taxes comensurate to what it&#039;s required under law.  

On top of that, as a personal note, I have been searching for two weeks at local new and used bookstores for a book without success, but I guarantee I will find it with a few clicks on Amazon or other online retailers.  Nonetheless, for every boarded up storefront they show, in my town there is a locally-owned, used book store popping up on every corner and they are PACKED with customers.  And, that&#039;s supposedly Amazon&#039;s primary competitor!  

It&#039;s time for states to realize that it&#039;s the inherent nature of the sales tax that&#039;s leading to declining sales tax revenues as our country moved away from manufacturing to service industries, not the Amazon boogieman/scapegoat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All state revenue administrators use Amazon as an excuse for declining sales tax revenues.  Whatever the sales tax savings Amazon provides to consumers is offset, if not exceeded, by the shipping changes which I see on used books to be at least 15% and sometimes even 100% of the book value.  So, the sales tax Amazon-benefit/local-burden is simply non-existent.  Then, what local services is Amazon paying for in California, North Carolina, Maryland, or any other state other than its home state?  Local bookstores receive police protection, roads to their stores, schools for its employees and their children.  FedEx receives a benefit, but they are not Amazon and they pay taxes comensurate to what it&#8217;s required under law.  </p>
<p>On top of that, as a personal note, I have been searching for two weeks at local new and used bookstores for a book without success, but I guarantee I will find it with a few clicks on Amazon or other online retailers.  Nonetheless, for every boarded up storefront they show, in my town there is a locally-owned, used book store popping up on every corner and they are PACKED with customers.  And, that&#8217;s supposedly Amazon&#8217;s primary competitor!  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for states to realize that it&#8217;s the inherent nature of the sales tax that&#8217;s leading to declining sales tax revenues as our country moved away from manufacturing to service industries, not the Amazon boogieman/scapegoat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
