Comments on: Charles Darwin vs. Adam Smith http://www.businesspundit.com/charles-darwin-vs-adam-smith/ Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:31:15 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Anonymous http://www.businesspundit.com/charles-darwin-vs-adam-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-586 Anonymous Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:40:29 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2544#comment-586 hi hi

]]> By: Bill Wells http://www.businesspundit.com/charles-darwin-vs-adam-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-585 Bill Wells Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:22:45 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2544#comment-585 I do not think it is that confused. The metaphysics, which all science rests upon, really is not working. The struggle to cut through and have a new foundation for understanding requires more than the emergence of a "cool house" for the invitation only crowd. We have got to understand, deeply understand how and why we are doing what we are doing. I do not think it is that confused. The metaphysics, which all science rests upon, really is not working. The struggle to cut through and have a new foundation for understanding requires more than the emergence of a “cool house” for the invitation only crowd. We have got to understand, deeply understand how and why we are doing what we are doing.

]]> By: asg http://www.businesspundit.com/charles-darwin-vs-adam-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-584 asg Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:27:13 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2544#comment-584 I didn't read the Galbraith article, primarily because the snippet you posted leaves no doubt whatsoever that he hasn't the slightest clue what he's talking about. I didn’t read the Galbraith article, primarily because the snippet you posted leaves no doubt whatsoever that he hasn’t the slightest clue what he’s talking about.

]]> By: David Foster http://www.businesspundit.com/charles-darwin-vs-adam-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-583 David Foster Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:49:46 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2544#comment-583 I don't think it's deep; I think it's just confused. Adam Smith's economics is quite Darwinian, and I thought this was well-understood by those who study intellectual history. The "invisible hand" was simply an outcome of forces that created organization without a central organizing intelligence, precisely as Darwinian evolution posits for living creatures. I don’t think it’s deep; I think it’s just confused. Adam Smith’s economics is quite Darwinian, and I thought this was well-understood by those who study intellectual history. The “invisible hand” was simply an outcome of forces that created organization without a central organizing intelligence, precisely as Darwinian evolution posits for living creatures.

]]> By: Rob http://www.businesspundit.com/charles-darwin-vs-adam-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-582 Rob Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:14:24 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2544#comment-582 LOL! No, I just like to pop in ever once in awhile to see what they are up to. LOL! No, I just like to pop in ever once in awhile to see what they are up to.

]]> By: laurence haughton http://www.businesspundit.com/charles-darwin-vs-adam-smith/comment-page-1/#comment-581 laurence haughton Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:31:04 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2544#comment-581 I've read this and reread this. All I get is he doesn't like John Roberts (and pRobably Scalito), is self-satisfied and snide (maybe just passive aggressive), and painful to read - with no clear point or proof. Then I noticed the Mother Jones logo. Were you researching rolling papers? I’ve read this and reread this. All I get is he doesn’t like John Roberts (and pRobably Scalito), is self-satisfied and snide (maybe just passive aggressive), and painful to read – with no clear point or proof.

Then I noticed the Mother Jones logo. Were you researching rolling papers?

]]>