<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumer Email Verification &#8211; Is It Better or Worse for Customer Service?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/consumer-email-verification-is-it-better-or-worse-for-customer-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/consumer-email-verification-is-it-better-or-worse-for-customer-service/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:54:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darrin</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/consumer-email-verification-is-it-better-or-worse-for-customer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2995#comment-1832</guid>
		<description>What About The Web Form Email Address Verification Annoyance

I find it an annoyance when a web form asks to &quot;verify&quot; my email address such as the form at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.raleys.com/apps/surveys/WebRoot/home.jsp?linksource=bee&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.raleys.com/apps/surveys/WebRoot/home.jsp?linksource=bee&lt;/a&gt;

Raley’s takes this annoyance one step further, by informing you that they will get the link in the email, so you MUST supply a valid email address to get the link if they want to help them out. It is not a convenience to customers, since a form field can be auto populated in most browsers these days. I am sure I am like many customers that find this annoying. Those who do not use auto populate are used to typing out all the form field information as they chose this security setting themselves. I am sure there are a few folks who do not know their email address well, they will figure that out. I would think most people have their correct address in that field. Verification should be used for password text boxes with the security feature enabled so that you only see asterisks, not for an email address.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What About The Web Form Email Address Verification Annoyance</p>
<p>I find it an annoyance when a web form asks to &#8220;verify&#8221; my email address such as the form at<br />
<a href="http://www.raleys.com/apps/surveys/WebRoot/home.jsp?linksource=bee" rel="nofollow">http://www.raleys.com/apps/surveys/WebRoot/home.jsp?linksource=bee</a></p>
<p>Raley’s takes this annoyance one step further, by informing you that they will get the link in the email, so you MUST supply a valid email address to get the link if they want to help them out. It is not a convenience to customers, since a form field can be auto populated in most browsers these days. I am sure I am like many customers that find this annoying. Those who do not use auto populate are used to typing out all the form field information as they chose this security setting themselves. I am sure there are a few folks who do not know their email address well, they will figure that out. I would think most people have their correct address in that field. Verification should be used for password text boxes with the security feature enabled so that you only see asterisks, not for an email address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.M.Mehdi Hassan</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/consumer-email-verification-is-it-better-or-worse-for-customer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>S.M.Mehdi Hassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2995#comment-1831</guid>
		<description>Spam is a problem and losing a customer at the cost of spam is bigger problem. I agree with Lee. If it is a small company with less resource then they should go for consumer email verification or else there is no need.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam is a problem and losing a customer at the cost of spam is bigger problem. I agree with Lee. If it is a small company with less resource then they should go for consumer email verification or else there is no need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReManufactured Toner</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/consumer-email-verification-is-it-better-or-worse-for-customer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>ReManufactured Toner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 07:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2995#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>Is 15 minutes in a day worth losing a customer over?  I get many spam E-Mails and they are so obvious that it takes maybe 10 minutes to weed out 50 E-Mails.  Also filters like spam assasin help mark the ones that are likely spam so this helps a lot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is 15 minutes in a day worth losing a customer over?  I get many spam E-Mails and they are so obvious that it takes maybe 10 minutes to weed out 50 E-Mails.  Also filters like spam assasin help mark the ones that are likely spam so this helps a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/consumer-email-verification-is-it-better-or-worse-for-customer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1829</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2995#comment-1829</guid>
		<description>Having worked as an online customer service agent, I can tell you that even with all kinds of spam filtering (though you can&#039;t filter too much or you miss legit email) that lots of spam still gets through and it takes 10-15 minutes out of each day just deleting the crap.

In this case, I think if you take an idealist approach and want a one-size fits all answer, it won&#039;t work.

If I&#039;m buying a refurbished printer, most likely from a small or very small company, then I see the need for them to keep their prices low and avoid the 15 minute resource drain of deleting emails every day.  Especially if I&#039;m getting a good price, then I personally sympathize.

That being said, if something like this is too much a bother, than maybe you just aren&#039;t the kind of customer they can &#039;afford.&#039;  But still a good question to put out there.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having worked as an online customer service agent, I can tell you that even with all kinds of spam filtering (though you can&#8217;t filter too much or you miss legit email) that lots of spam still gets through and it takes 10-15 minutes out of each day just deleting the crap.</p>
<p>In this case, I think if you take an idealist approach and want a one-size fits all answer, it won&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m buying a refurbished printer, most likely from a small or very small company, then I see the need for them to keep their prices low and avoid the 15 minute resource drain of deleting emails every day.  Especially if I&#8217;m getting a good price, then I personally sympathize.</p>
<p>That being said, if something like this is too much a bother, than maybe you just aren&#8217;t the kind of customer they can &#8216;afford.&#8217;  But still a good question to put out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biddy</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/consumer-email-verification-is-it-better-or-worse-for-customer-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>Biddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 01:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2995#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>I HATE these. If I get them from my own customers, I have to grit my teeth while clicking the link to say I&#039;m for real and I&#039;m only confirming dispatch of their poxy order... If I get them from people I&#039;m trying to buy from, then I do NOT buy from them. There are so many better ways of dealing with spam that frankly, I can ONLY JUST be bothered to deal with these idiots who think they need a pneumatic drill to crack a pistachio.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HATE these. If I get them from my own customers, I have to grit my teeth while clicking the link to say I&#8217;m for real and I&#8217;m only confirming dispatch of their poxy order&#8230; If I get them from people I&#8217;m trying to buy from, then I do NOT buy from them. There are so many better ways of dealing with spam that frankly, I can ONLY JUST be bothered to deal with these idiots who think they need a pneumatic drill to crack a pistachio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
