Don’t Believe The Hype: Digg, Businessweek, and Accountability


When I saw the latest Businessweek cover and read why Kevin Rose is worth $60 million, I didn't even deem it bloggable. Yes, I laughed at the fact that Digg is valued at $200 million, but I think I've harped enough on the why Web2.0 isn't worth what people think it is, and I didn't want to beat that dead horse any more. I decided to comment because over the past few days, the story has taken a beating in the blogosphere. I love when that happens. Here is just a small sample of the almost 300 blogs commenting on the story.

37signals, a very pro Web2.0 company, led with some early commentary saying don't believe the bubble math.

Good Morning Silicon Valley cracked me up with this commentary.

It's tossed out in mid-article with virtually no explanation along with another suspect figure that values Digg at $200 million. Quite a fairy tale, no? Reminds me of the days when a black-and-white sock puppet interviewed fellow canines, the billboard over 101 was still lush and everything was bubblicious.

Kiwibloke expresses his skepticism

I have less confidence in sites whose traffic is predicated on social bookmarking ( or the latest craze "voter based bookmarking" or Digging. My reasoning is that the benefit from the user is transient. The benefit of long term participation is unclear because the system has already shown that it is open to manipulation. This has resulted in a small group controlling the bulk of the digging on the site. Over time I suspect that the audience will move away as another trend takes it's place. Unlike Myspace I am unclear as to whether the network effect is present in Digg, Newsvine and others.

Techdirt calls Kevin Rose a vapormillionaire.

How to Keep Your Employees Happy Without Giving Them a Raise

Here's what I don't understand. Digg has been praised in so many ways. The business model and user interaction model is supposed to take down old media. Yet, 18 months into it Digg is barely breaking even on $3 million in revenue. In my view, I would compare this to buying an Applebee's franchise. Seriously. I would bet an Applebees in a high foot traffic area makes that kind of revenue 18 months in, and probably shows a few hundred thousand in profit at that. So why the big deal?

The idea isn't revolutionary, the financials aren't revolutionary, so why all the excitement? Don't get me wrong, I think someone will buy Digg (and overpay) and the VCs will cash out, but what is really happening is a mistake in analysis. The success of MySpace makes everyone want to jump into this game, and VCs have extrapolated from a few unique cases to some kind of general rule that doesn't exist. Digg isn't Myspace, and neither are most Web2.0 companies. Digg has no user inertia. If something slightly better comes along, the consumer barriers to change are extremely low.

And anyway, have you seen Digg's business section? YAWN…

  • MySpace “successful”? By what standards? Porn? Traffic? 6 million poor kids promoting crummy music to 6 million other poor kids, everybody’s blinking and flashing, but nobody’s buying.

  • ricardo

    Should the Digg article come as a surprise? No way! Business Week magazine is in financial trouble, barely profitable at best, so the company is looking to the website to make its money. The story was written by an online reporter and, according to people I know who work there, forced down the throat of a very weak magazine by the woman who runs online. Apparently she’s been telling people that the magazine editor isn’t going to hold on to his job for too much longer, so forcing her unit’s story on the magazine was a power play to show the suits that she’s the real live wire in the organization.

    Trouble is that BW’s online operation is now a schlock fest of Forbes-style “wealth porn” and shock-horror financial journalism (count how many times in the past six months the site has opredicted the property market is poised not just to cool but to collapse). Moreover, all the good journalists have quit, leaving nothing but kids and weak reeds who do what the online boss tells them.

    Most interestingly, the woman now running online was the head of BW’s eBiz unit in the pre-Bubble days, when she got her reporters to hype every madhouse business plan that came down the pike.

    She talked up that bubble; now she’s taling up another. Thank God for blogs, because now we can call the “news professionals” on their sins — and the Digg story is a mortal sin against accuracy.