<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Steps to Killing the Scrutiny-Defense Dynamic in Interviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/five-steps-to-killing-the-scrutiny-defense-dynamic-in-interviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/five-steps-to-killing-the-scrutiny-defense-dynamic-in-interviews/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:54:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Barr</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/five-steps-to-killing-the-scrutiny-defense-dynamic-in-interviews/comment-page-1/#comment-7966</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Barr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=4561#comment-7966</guid>
		<description>I will make this easy Drea, the degree of submission the interviewees exhibited is in direct correlation to necessity in getting the job. The more you need it, the more you sweat it. 

Thank God I don&#039;t have to go through that crap anymore!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will make this easy Drea, the degree of submission the interviewees exhibited is in direct correlation to necessity in getting the job. The more you need it, the more you sweat it. </p>
<p>Thank God I don&#8217;t have to go through that crap anymore!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kare Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/five-steps-to-killing-the-scrutiny-defense-dynamic-in-interviews/comment-page-1/#comment-7960</link>
		<dc:creator>Kare Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=4561#comment-7960</guid>
		<description>With that in mind, what parts of a face most influence first impressions?
http://sayitbetter.typepad.com/say_it_better/2008/08/what-make-us-wa.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With that in mind, what parts of a face most influence first impressions?<br />
<a href="http://sayitbetter.typepad.com/say_it_better/2008/08/what-make-us-wa.html" rel="nofollow">http://sayitbetter.typepad.com/say_it_better/2008/08/what-make-us-wa.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/five-steps-to-killing-the-scrutiny-defense-dynamic-in-interviews/comment-page-1/#comment-7955</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=4561#comment-7955</guid>
		<description>I think that one of the things that is generally presumed is that an employment interview is a one sided affair.  The presumptive interviewer (the Employer) interviews the applicant.  To me, and I have done a lot of interviews over the past few years, it is a two way street with both sides having a lot at stake.  And because of the asymmetrical information each has they had better both be on their game, well prepared, and curious about what each has to offer because the more aligned and of the same tribe the parties are the better the likelihood of success.  The person being interviewed had better be well prepared about what he/she wants to know about a potential employer ... culture, style, rules, tasks, opportunities, necessary skills, etc., etc. It does not sound like any of those interviews held anything remotely like the two way street an interview should really be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that one of the things that is generally presumed is that an employment interview is a one sided affair.  The presumptive interviewer (the Employer) interviews the applicant.  To me, and I have done a lot of interviews over the past few years, it is a two way street with both sides having a lot at stake.  And because of the asymmetrical information each has they had better both be on their game, well prepared, and curious about what each has to offer because the more aligned and of the same tribe the parties are the better the likelihood of success.  The person being interviewed had better be well prepared about what he/she wants to know about a potential employer &#8230; culture, style, rules, tasks, opportunities, necessary skills, etc., etc. It does not sound like any of those interviews held anything remotely like the two way street an interview should really be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
