<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Groups Solve Problems Better Than Individuals?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/groups-solve-problems-better-than-individuals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/groups-solve-problems-better-than-individuals/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:54:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: association</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/groups-solve-problems-better-than-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>association</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2652#comment-849</guid>
		<description>It is understandable why groups are better than single minds. They discuss, they put together pieces of information and their ideas, they reach to the best decision by providing answers to different questions, while a single person can be wrong even if he thinks his solution is the best one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is understandable why groups are better than single minds. They discuss, they put together pieces of information and their ideas, they reach to the best decision by providing answers to different questions, while a single person can be wrong even if he thinks his solution is the best one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurence haughton</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/groups-solve-problems-better-than-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>laurence haughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2652#comment-848</guid>
		<description>If only it were anything close to that simple.

Who&#039;s an expert? How do you select one?  How do you use a small group and avoid group think (or the &quot;counting horse&quot; bias)?  And crowds... how do you seperate the wheat from the chaff?

As to this research... they used problems where there is &quot;one&quot; right answer.  That&#039;s not the case in business. Nor is failing to have the right answer the sole reason that an answer fails.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only it were anything close to that simple.</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s an expert? How do you select one?  How do you use a small group and avoid group think (or the &#8220;counting horse&#8221; bias)?  And crowds&#8230; how do you seperate the wheat from the chaff?</p>
<p>As to this research&#8230; they used problems where there is &#8220;one&#8221; right answer.  That&#8217;s not the case in business. Nor is failing to have the right answer the sole reason that an answer fails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/groups-solve-problems-better-than-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2652#comment-847</guid>
		<description>David,
I think that is a great start.  The key is understanding what kind of problem you have.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
I think that is a great start.  The key is understanding what kind of problem you have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidG</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/groups-solve-problems-better-than-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2652#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Strong parallel to your earlier post about experts v. crowds. Who is best at what might not be so hard to tease out.
Try this hypothesis ...
1) Need expertise? Use an expert.
2) Need a decision? Use a small team.
3) Need an opinion? Use a crowd.
Where;
1) expertise is the single BEST way of solving a problem,
2) decision is the optimal of multiple potential solutions and,
3) opinion is an unproven solution, most likely to succeed.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strong parallel to your earlier post about experts v. crowds. Who is best at what might not be so hard to tease out.<br />
Try this hypothesis &#8230;<br />
1) Need expertise? Use an expert.<br />
2) Need a decision? Use a small team.<br />
3) Need an opinion? Use a crowd.<br />
Where;<br />
1) expertise is the single BEST way of solving a problem,<br />
2) decision is the optimal of multiple potential solutions and,<br />
3) opinion is an unproven solution, most likely to succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/groups-solve-problems-better-than-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2652#comment-845</guid>
		<description>I feel that for some people working in a group can be a disaster. I love indivualism and freedom associated with it. Most of the, when I have worked in a group, I have ran into problem. So, for me it does not work out well. I just feel that working in a group takes away much of my energy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that for some people working in a group can be a disaster. I love indivualism and freedom associated with it. Most of the, when I have worked in a group, I have ran into problem. So, for me it does not work out well. I just feel that working in a group takes away much of my energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/groups-solve-problems-better-than-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2652#comment-844</guid>
		<description>Its better to work in groups as many ideas will flood in. The more the better. But u cant underestimate the power of individual mind. Ya it might be tricky to use groups for solving problems. Depending upon the problem.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its better to work in groups as many ideas will flood in. The more the better. But u cant underestimate the power of individual mind. Ya it might be tricky to use groups for solving problems. Depending upon the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/groups-solve-problems-better-than-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2652#comment-843</guid>
		<description>Either you didn&#039;t read the book, or you didn&#039;t read the research I linked to, because they are incompatible.  The &quot;wisdom of crowds&quot; only works when crowd members act independent of each other.  When they work together they usually fail.  A better model would be Robert Wright&#039;s &quot;Nonzero&quot; which says that humans work well in groups when they plan nonzero sum games and all parties benefit.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either you didn&#8217;t read the book, or you didn&#8217;t read the research I linked to, because they are incompatible.  The &#8220;wisdom of crowds&#8221; only works when crowd members act independent of each other.  When they work together they usually fail.  A better model would be Robert Wright&#8217;s &#8220;Nonzero&#8221; which says that humans work well in groups when they plan nonzero sum games and all parties benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kbzimm</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/groups-solve-problems-better-than-individuals/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>kbzimm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 02:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2652#comment-842</guid>
		<description>See: The Wisdom of Crowds, published in 2004.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See: The Wisdom of Crowds, published in 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
