<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innovation Through Acquisition:  The &quot;Yes, But&quot; Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/innovation-through-acquisition-the-yes-but-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/innovation-through-acquisition-the-yes-but-strategy/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:31:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/innovation-through-acquisition-the-yes-but-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 23:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2342#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Excellent point... and the comment pRoblem is on my side.  The MT upgrade requires me to approve comments.  I&#039;ve turned that feature off, but it still isn&#039;t working.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point&#8230; and the comment pRoblem is on my side.  The MT upgrade requires me to approve comments.  I&#8217;ve turned that feature off, but it still isn&#8217;t working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/innovation-through-acquisition-the-yes-but-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2342#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Apologies if this gets double posted - don&#039;t think my first shot went through.

To answer question 2) - few to none. The odd thing about the corporate ladder is that the higher up you go, the number of decisions you need to make whereby one can judge your competence decreases. Look at it from this perspective - an incompetent secretary is unlikely to last long, but it can take an incompetent CEO (Phillip Purcell, for example) years before he/she gets his/her due. We tend to overestimate our abilities, rationalize our failures, and understimate the role of luck.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies if this gets double posted &#8211; don&#8217;t think my first shot went through.</p>
<p>To answer question 2) &#8211; few to none. The odd thing about the corporate ladder is that the higher up you go, the number of decisions you need to make whereby one can judge your competence decreases. Look at it from this perspective &#8211; an incompetent secretary is unlikely to last long, but it can take an incompetent CEO (Phillip Purcell, for example) years before he/she gets his/her due. We tend to overestimate our abilities, rationalize our failures, and understimate the role of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/innovation-through-acquisition-the-yes-but-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2342#comment-154</guid>
		<description>To answer question 2) - few to none. The odd thing about the corporate ladder is that the higher up you go, the number of decisions you need to make whereby one can judge your competence decreases. Look at it from this perspective - an incompetent secretary is unlikely to last long, but it can take an incompetent CEO (Phillip Purcell, for example) years before he/she gets his/her due. We tend to overestimate our abilities, rationalize our failures, and understimate the role of luck.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer question 2) &#8211; few to none. The odd thing about the corporate ladder is that the higher up you go, the number of decisions you need to make whereby one can judge your competence decreases. Look at it from this perspective &#8211; an incompetent secretary is unlikely to last long, but it can take an incompetent CEO (Phillip Purcell, for example) years before he/she gets his/her due. We tend to overestimate our abilities, rationalize our failures, and understimate the role of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/innovation-through-acquisition-the-yes-but-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 03:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2342#comment-153</guid>
		<description>M&amp;A is about stock price, not &quot;real&quot; value.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M&#038;A is about stock price, not &#8220;real&#8221; value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
