<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Irrational Exuberance&#8230;Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/irrational-exuberanceagain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/irrational-exuberanceagain/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:54:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ali</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/irrational-exuberanceagain/comment-page-1/#comment-7259</link>
		<dc:creator>ali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2445#comment-7259</guid>
		<description>I agree with the book - however we saw the market increase 3000 points since this post before tanking Oct 2007. How do we justify that? Should we forget about timing and just dollar-cost for life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the book &#8211; however we saw the market increase 3000 points since this post before tanking Oct 2007. How do we justify that? Should we forget about timing and just dollar-cost for life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davis Freeberg</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/irrational-exuberanceagain/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Davis Freeberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2445#comment-333</guid>
		<description>I would argue that the latest bubble is being driven more by private investment then in publically traded stocks.  Too many baby boomers got burned in the implosion, but a lot of hedge funds are still will to invest massive amounts of capital in pre-IPO companies.

I don&#039;t think that the term bubble is the best term to use, but there is clearly a lot of interest in these successful privately held companies.  I really see this more as the filling of the bubble that we expected back in the late 90&#039;s.  At that point people did get ahead of themselves, but the fact of the matter is that there is a technological revolution that is developing from those roots.  As companies and hedge funds continue to see success in these private investments, it could translate into the public market, but for now it appears that it&#039;s a private bubble and not a public one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue that the latest bubble is being driven more by private investment then in publically traded stocks.  Too many baby boomers got burned in the implosion, but a lot of hedge funds are still will to invest massive amounts of capital in pre-IPO companies.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that the term bubble is the best term to use, but there is clearly a lot of interest in these successful privately held companies.  I really see this more as the filling of the bubble that we expected back in the late 90&#8217;s.  At that point people did get ahead of themselves, but the fact of the matter is that there is a technological revolution that is developing from those roots.  As companies and hedge funds continue to see success in these private investments, it could translate into the public market, but for now it appears that it&#8217;s a private bubble and not a public one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/irrational-exuberanceagain/comment-page-1/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 10:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2445#comment-332</guid>
		<description>Yes, just try getting an investor to buy an option. It doesn&#039;t matter if you explain that selling an option entails a (theoretically) infinite loss, and your upside is limited. As far as I can tell, only two things matter: 1) I&#039;m recieving cash, not paying it out and 2) My option won&#039;t get excercised. We stink at dealing with pRobabilistic payoffs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, just try getting an investor to buy an option. It doesn&#8217;t matter if you explain that selling an option entails a (theoretically) infinite loss, and your upside is limited. As far as I can tell, only two things matter: 1) I&#8217;m recieving cash, not paying it out and 2) My option won&#8217;t get excercised. We stink at dealing with pRobabilistic payoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/irrational-exuberanceagain/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 04:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2445#comment-331</guid>
		<description>The one and only time I&#039;ve been to Vegas, I remember being astounded at a woman who was playing a slot machine and said to her friend &quot;Oh look!  Just a little bit more and I would have had three diamonds.&quot;  I kept thinking &quot;yes, but it&#039;s a binary outcome.  You win or lose.  How close you are is irrelevant.&quot;  Somehow I think being close made her want to play again.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one and only time I&#8217;ve been to Vegas, I remember being astounded at a woman who was playing a slot machine and said to her friend &#8220;Oh look!  Just a little bit more and I would have had three diamonds.&#8221;  I kept thinking &#8220;yes, but it&#8217;s a binary outcome.  You win or lose.  How close you are is irrelevant.&#8221;  Somehow I think being close made her want to play again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurence haughton</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/irrational-exuberanceagain/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>laurence haughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2445#comment-330</guid>
		<description>Is there any known connection between investor behavior and Skinner&#039;s variable schedules of reinforcement?

I know the people who design slot machines are hip to this theory but are the financial services people on it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any known connection between investor behavior and Skinner&#8217;s variable schedules of reinforcement?</p>
<p>I know the people who design slot machines are hip to this theory but are the financial services people on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
