Comments on: KFC’s New “Double Down” Sandwich All Meat, No Bread

By: jodokus

jodokus — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:08:30 +0000

Exactly, jason. How dare they make food and then force it down people’s throats! Oh wait, they didn’t. It’s just as much the fault of the people as it is of the companies.

By: jason

jason — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:45:36 +0000

And with this we continue on the downward spiral. The government should start slapping a big fat tax on items like this since KFC and the others have shown no self control.

By: Barney Stellar

Barney Stellar — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 13:36:19 +0000

It is actually called the KFC Double Down Burger and it looks incredible. I am such a chicken fan and deep-fried fillets (the healthiest cut) are my favorite. I am contemplating (considering, to all you dummies out there) driving 5 hours to get one. But, I will probably just wait until they are sold in my city (or nearby). To those out there who feel it is a bad idea to bring out such a product when America is so fat, let people eat what they want. I’ll drink a glass of milk with mine, if it will shut you up.
And why is everyone complaining that the chicken is the bun? KFC is concerned about our collective health and decided to do away with the bread. Thanks, KFC.
And what about the guy/gal who eats a 3-piece meal? Or has a bucket for dinner with the family and eats 4 pieces, fries, gravy, coleslaw, pop and a piece of cake?

By: Thogek

Thogek — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 03:24:40 +0000

Um…wow.

That thing is both impressive (points for outside-the-bun creativity) and frightening (for voluminous fried fattiness).

Any idea how the fat and calorie counts would change if the fillets were grilled (or otherwise prepared) instead of fried? (They do serve Kentucky Grilled Chicken, after all.) I’m very curious if someone’s run those numbers…