<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessons From the DotCom Bubble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/lessons-from-the-dotcom-bubble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/lessons-from-the-dotcom-bubble/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:31:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sanjay Kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/lessons-from-the-dotcom-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-2119</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjay Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3105#comment-2119</guid>
		<description>First to get it *right*, not first to have something out there.  Absolutely correct.  There are numerous examples of quote/unquote &quot;follower&quot; companies out there that are and will ultimately succeed.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.simplifythis.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SimplifyThis.com&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First to get it *right*, not first to have something out there.  Absolutely correct.  There are numerous examples of quote/unquote &#8220;follower&#8221; companies out there that are and will ultimately succeed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simplifythis.com" rel="nofollow">SimplifyThis.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John W. McKenna</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/lessons-from-the-dotcom-bubble/comment-page-1/#comment-2118</link>
		<dc:creator>John W. McKenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3105#comment-2118</guid>
		<description>Rob

I was a bit surprised that the failure rate was so low; only 50% versus independent restaurants at 61%.  I would have bet the risk of failure was much higher for a technology start up.

As for failure, my anecdotally-driven opinion, unsupported by research and/or sound logic, supports the conclusions of the article. The willingness to suffer failure seems to be the forge that builds the most spectacular of successes.

The article&#039;s coverage of the first-mover fallacy and overhyped network thinking reminds me of a chapter in John Herman’s new book, “The Innkeeper Tales” that provides an insider’s view of an entrepreneur’s meteoric rise that eventually goes bust: great idea, great IPO, great product placement and a great ride until everything went bust.

Take care...

John

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob</p>
<p>I was a bit surprised that the failure rate was so low; only 50% versus independent restaurants at 61%.  I would have bet the risk of failure was much higher for a technology start up.</p>
<p>As for failure, my anecdotally-driven opinion, unsupported by research and/or sound logic, supports the conclusions of the article. The willingness to suffer failure seems to be the forge that builds the most spectacular of successes.</p>
<p>The article&#8217;s coverage of the first-mover fallacy and overhyped network thinking reminds me of a chapter in John Herman’s new book, “The Innkeeper Tales” that provides an insider’s view of an entrepreneur’s meteoric rise that eventually goes bust: great idea, great IPO, great product placement and a great ride until everything went bust.</p>
<p>Take care&#8230;</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
