<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Arrington Gets Negative on Web 2.0 &#8211; Acquires FuckedCompany.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/michael-arrington-gets-negative-on-web-20-acquires-fuckedcompanycom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/michael-arrington-gets-negative-on-web-20-acquires-fuckedcompanycom/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:31:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Berislav Lopac</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/michael-arrington-gets-negative-on-web-20-acquires-fuckedcompanycom/comment-page-1/#comment-2157</link>
		<dc:creator>Berislav Lopac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3115#comment-2157</guid>
		<description>&quot;I think the Web 2.0 bubble is starting to bust, as people realize you do need a real business model to run a company&quot;

Of course you do -- but Web 2.0 is not necessarily about running companies. Here&#039;s a nice overview: &lt;a href=&quot;http://franticindustries.com/blog/2007/03/29/are-you-creating-a-product-or-launching-a-business/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://franticindustries.com/blog/2007/03/29/are-you-creating-a-product-or-launching-a-business/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think the Web 2.0 bubble is starting to bust, as people realize you do need a real business model to run a company&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course you do &#8212; but Web 2.0 is not necessarily about running companies. Here&#8217;s a nice overview: <a href="http://franticindustries.com/blog/2007/03/29/are-you-creating-a-product-or-launching-a-business/" rel="nofollow">http://franticindustries.com/blog/2007/03/29/are-you-creating-a-product-or-launching-a-business/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/michael-arrington-gets-negative-on-web-20-acquires-fuckedcompanycom/comment-page-1/#comment-2156</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 19:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3115#comment-2156</guid>
		<description>Yes I did think for a second that it could be an April Fool&#039;s joke, but I assumed it was posted on March 31st for that very reason - so that people would take it seriously.

Whether it&#039;s a sham or not, I think the Web 2.0 bubble is starting to bust, as people realize you do need a real business model to run a company.  Holding out for the &quot;acquisition lottery&quot; is a bad strategy with so many copycat companies.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I did think for a second that it could be an April Fool&#8217;s joke, but I assumed it was posted on March 31st for that very reason &#8211; so that people would take it seriously.</p>
<p>Whether it&#8217;s a sham or not, I think the Web 2.0 bubble is starting to bust, as people realize you do need a real business model to run a company.  Holding out for the &#8220;acquisition lottery&#8221; is a bad strategy with so many copycat companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berislav Lopac</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/michael-arrington-gets-negative-on-web-20-acquires-fuckedcompanycom/comment-page-1/#comment-2155</link>
		<dc:creator>Berislav Lopac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 17:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3115#comment-2155</guid>
		<description>You did, of course, check the today&#039;s date?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You did, of course, check the today&#8217;s date?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
