Comments on: The 12 Most Valuable Teams in NCAA Football http://www.businesspundit.com/the-12-most-valuable-teams-in-ncaa-football/ Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:09:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: David Roth http://www.businesspundit.com/the-12-most-valuable-teams-in-ncaa-football/comment-page-1/#comment-31342 David Roth Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:24:43 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=19463#comment-31342 It's a travesty that the players get none of that revenue (besides scholarships) and that the NCAA is allowed to have a blanket collusion/wage control. Many of them would get half a million up per year if wages were not fixed. I had jobs programming computers and gathering data in college and nobody told my employers they couldn't hire me at the going wage just because I was a student and because I was getting "training." It’s a travesty that the players get none of that revenue (besides scholarships) and that the NCAA is allowed to have a blanket collusion/wage control. Many of them would get half a million up per year if wages were not fixed. I had jobs programming computers and gathering data in college and nobody told my employers they couldn’t hire me at the going wage just because I was a student and because I was getting “training.”

]]> By: jack http://www.businesspundit.com/the-12-most-valuable-teams-in-ncaa-football/comment-page-1/#comment-26675 jack Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:41:16 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=19463#comment-26675 youre all f'in idiots youre all f’in idiots

]]> By: Joe http://www.businesspundit.com/the-12-most-valuable-teams-in-ncaa-football/comment-page-1/#comment-24272 Joe Sun, 18 Jul 2010 23:42:06 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=19463#comment-24272 I'm sorry, but the idea that Georgia is only worth 4 million more than South Carolina, a program that has done nothing in it's history, is laughable. I don't trust Forbes when it comes to this list. I’m sorry, but the idea that Georgia is only worth 4 million more than South Carolina, a program that has done nothing in it’s history, is laughable. I don’t trust Forbes when it comes to this list.

]]> By: Cojones http://www.businesspundit.com/the-12-most-valuable-teams-in-ncaa-football/comment-page-1/#comment-23217 Cojones Mon, 10 May 2010 17:42:01 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=19463#comment-23217 Georgia is tied at 5th in monetary value with Fl according to your published data. The differences in overall worth is 4 mil(Fl) and the difference in yearly take is 4 mil(UGA). At that rate next year UGA will be 5th alone. And present value is after FU played for the SEC and a NC the year before. Didn't anyone pay them for those games? What's with the poster about the shot of Bama? It's their team in their stadium. And why didn't the author publish the data (Bama) you predicated your reasoning upon? I'm amazed that Tenn wasn't on this list, especially since their stadium is 107k plus. Maybe they have better CFOs who can hide the money. A friend of mine of whom/what you don't know (Jack Schidtt) could have done better. Georgia is tied at 5th in monetary value with Fl according to your published data. The differences in overall worth is 4 mil(Fl) and the difference in yearly take is 4 mil(UGA). At that rate next year UGA will be 5th alone. And present value is after FU played for the SEC and a NC the year before. Didn’t anyone pay them for those games?

What’s with the poster about the shot of Bama? It’s their team in their stadium. And why didn’t the author publish the data (Bama) you predicated your reasoning upon? I’m amazed that Tenn wasn’t on this list, especially since their stadium is 107k plus. Maybe they have better CFOs who can hide the money. A friend of mine of whom/what you don’t know (Jack Schidtt) could have done better.

]]> By: messenger of truth http://www.businesspundit.com/the-12-most-valuable-teams-in-ncaa-football/comment-page-1/#comment-21623 messenger of truth Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:44:51 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=19463#comment-21623 Look fools. Teams on this list are either traditional powers [most] or moderately successful teams from places where college football is notably popular [like the South]. This is the actual list from forbes.com so stop hating just because your team is not as valuable as you thought. Look fools. Teams on this list are either traditional powers [most] or moderately successful teams from places where college football is notably popular [like the South]. This is the actual list from forbes.com so stop hating just because your team is not as valuable as you thought.

]]> By: messenger of truth http://www.businesspundit.com/the-12-most-valuable-teams-in-ncaa-football/comment-page-1/#comment-21603 messenger of truth Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:01:56 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=19463#comment-21603 Ben Dover you are wrong - it's South Carolina. http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/22/most-vaulable-college-football-teams-business-sports-college-football_slide_13.html Ben Dover you are wrong – it’s South Carolina.

http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/22/most-vaulable-college-football-teams-business-sports-college-football_slide_13.html

]]> By: Eileen Dover http://www.businesspundit.com/the-12-most-valuable-teams-in-ncaa-football/comment-page-1/#comment-21601 Eileen Dover Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:51:58 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=19463#comment-21601 Hey, Ben Dover You need to get a clue because they have the right USC in there. South Carolina was also 12th last year. Get your facts straight my man. Just because you think it should be otherwise doesnt make it true. Hey, Ben Dover

You need to get a clue because they have the right USC in there. South Carolina was also 12th last year. Get your facts straight my man. Just because you think it should be otherwise doesnt make it true.

]]> By: Robert http://www.businesspundit.com/the-12-most-valuable-teams-in-ncaa-football/comment-page-1/#comment-21598 Robert Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:22:09 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=19463#comment-21598 South Carolina on this list? This has got to be bogus! South Carolina on this list? This has got to be bogus!

]]> By: Jim http://www.businesspundit.com/the-12-most-valuable-teams-in-ncaa-football/comment-page-1/#comment-21590 Jim Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:31:32 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=19463#comment-21590 What is your criteria to make the top 12 in the nation? You are clearly ignorant of the aspects of college football. If history is a criteria, you can drop South Carolina and Georgia and replace one of them with Southern Cal. Or are your sights only teams east of the Mississippi. Having said that, how about the 12 top teams west of the Mississippi. What is your criteria to make the top 12 in the nation? You are clearly ignorant of the aspects of college football. If history is a criteria, you can drop South Carolina and Georgia and replace one of them with Southern Cal. Or are your sights only teams east of the Mississippi. Having said that, how about the 12 top teams west of the Mississippi.

]]> By: Kenny Powers http://www.businesspundit.com/the-12-most-valuable-teams-in-ncaa-football/comment-page-1/#comment-21588 Kenny Powers Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:43:03 +0000 http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=19463#comment-21588 Mike, looks like Oklahoma players with Texas fans in the background at the Red River Rivalry. Subtle as Sam Bradford's injury prone shoulder. It's comes as no surprise the overrated Pac-10 holds no value on this list, much less in National relevance. I am surprised how many Big-10, soon to be Little-12, schools are on this list. Hands down the Little-12(Big-10) is the only NCAA conference more overrated than the Pac-10. I'd take the SEC over the Little-12 any day of the week. It was quite shocking how successful Chizik was with talented players at Auburn unlike his time as HC at Iowa State. (Yes, I know Malzahn played a big part in Auburn's success and Chizik had Tubbervile's leftovers. However, I'll point Chizik's success shed light on a potentially long term problem. Chizik doesn't appear to be the kind of great coach who can get the best/most out of his players regardless of talent. Something great up and coming coaches like Brian Kelly and Randy Edsall have done phenomenally.) Mike, looks like Oklahoma players with Texas fans in the background at the Red River Rivalry. Subtle as Sam Bradford’s injury prone shoulder.

It’s comes as no surprise the overrated Pac-10 holds no value on this list, much less in National relevance. I am surprised how many Big-10, soon to be Little-12, schools are on this list. Hands down the Little-12(Big-10) is the only NCAA conference more overrated than the Pac-10. I’d take the SEC over the Little-12 any day of the week.

It was quite shocking how successful Chizik was with talented players at Auburn unlike his time as HC at Iowa State. (Yes, I know Malzahn played a big part in Auburn’s success and Chizik had Tubbervile’s leftovers. However, I’ll point Chizik’s success shed light on a potentially long term problem. Chizik doesn’t appear to be the kind of great coach who can get the best/most out of his players regardless of talent. Something great up and coming coaches like Brian Kelly and Randy Edsall have done phenomenally.)

]]>