<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Myth Is Over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/the-google-myth-is-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-google-myth-is-over/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:31:15 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: muckdog</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-google-myth-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-1600</link>
		<dc:creator>muckdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2904#comment-1600</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Google&quot; is a great search engine. President Bush likes the maps.  But I&#039;ll never understand the revenue model where they give away email, blogs, searches, videos, news, financial info, newsgroups, etc. for FREE while having advertisers pay for ads on the webpages.  Who reads those ads?  Who clicks on those ads?  I have no idea.  It seems like a big fraud to me.

Although I&#039;d like to send my utility company a letter:

&quot;Dear Sir/Madam:

I realize that you are currently making money by charging for therms and kilowatts.  But think of all the money you could make if you gave away the gas and energy for free, and just stuck a bunch of ads in the monthly usage statements.  It&#039;s working for Google.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Google&#8221; is a great search engine. President Bush likes the maps.  But I&#8217;ll never understand the revenue model where they give away email, blogs, searches, videos, news, financial info, newsgroups, etc. for FREE while having advertisers pay for ads on the webpages.  Who reads those ads?  Who clicks on those ads?  I have no idea.  It seems like a big fraud to me.</p>
<p>Although I&#8217;d like to send my utility company a letter:</p>
<p>&#8220;Dear Sir/Madam:</p>
<p>I realize that you are currently making money by charging for therms and kilowatts.  But think of all the money you could make if you gave away the gas and energy for free, and just stuck a bunch of ads in the monthly usage statements.  It&#8217;s working for Google.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olala</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-google-myth-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-1599</link>
		<dc:creator>Olala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2904#comment-1599</guid>
		<description>There are many other myths around Google, some of my favourites are: &quot;Google Adsense is going to make you millionaire in a couple of months&quot; and &quot;Be careful if your traffic suddenly increases, Google may think that you are doing spamming.&quot; Thank God they&#039;re just myths.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many other myths around Google, some of my favourites are: &#8220;Google Adsense is going to make you millionaire in a couple of months&#8221; and &#8220;Be careful if your traffic suddenly increases, Google may think that you are doing spamming.&#8221; Thank God they&#8217;re just myths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david foster</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-google-myth-is-over/comment-page-1/#comment-1598</link>
		<dc:creator>david foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2904#comment-1598</guid>
		<description>An interesting argument, and I think one that has some truth in it. Groups of software engineers left to themselves will often tend to focus more on things that are directly relevant to their own activities--like re-architecting code to make it easier to maintain, or reimplementing it using the tools du jour--than developing new functionality for external customers.

In the specific case of video, I would think there are quite a few pissed-off developers who feel that their product never got a fair chance.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting argument, and I think one that has some truth in it. Groups of software engineers left to themselves will often tend to focus more on things that are directly relevant to their own activities&#8211;like re-architecting code to make it easier to maintain, or reimplementing it using the tools du jour&#8211;than developing new functionality for external customers.</p>
<p>In the specific case of video, I would think there are quite a few pissed-off developers who feel that their product never got a fair chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
