<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New WSJ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/the-new-wsj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-new-wsj/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regia</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-new-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-1838</link>
		<dc:creator>Regia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 23:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2999#comment-1838</guid>
		<description>I created this video on the WSJ ad. regiaart.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I created this video on the WSJ ad. regiaart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilya</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-new-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 04:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2999#comment-1837</guid>
		<description>Having been on the verge of subscribing for weeks, this article convinced me to finally subscribe to the online edition. So I went to the site and was greeted with a popup window encouraging me to subscribe.

Ok, it&#039;s annoying and I hate popups, but that&#039;s what I was looking for anyway; No biggie. I click the big &quot;Subscribe&quot; button in the popup, and it opens another tab inside of the tiny popup window, which is unusable. I guess they didn&#039;t test this on Firefox.

Alright, I can deal with this. Close the popup window, look for the &quot;Subscribe&quot; link on the main page for about 10 seconds, click it. Another popup appears. This is becoming annoying. Since Firefox has a pretty clever popup blocker, this indicates that the WSJ webmaster team spent some time devising this even more clever popup script to get around my popup blocker -- despite the fact that I obviously hate popups.

I am determined, however, so I close the second popup, and start filling out the form. I don&#039;t remember exactly how or when, but a third popup appears.

I stop filling out the form and close the window.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been on the verge of subscribing for weeks, this article convinced me to finally subscribe to the online edition. So I went to the site and was greeted with a popup window encouraging me to subscribe.</p>
<p>Ok, it&#8217;s annoying and I hate popups, but that&#8217;s what I was looking for anyway; No biggie. I click the big &#8220;Subscribe&#8221; button in the popup, and it opens another tab inside of the tiny popup window, which is unusable. I guess they didn&#8217;t test this on Firefox.</p>
<p>Alright, I can deal with this. Close the popup window, look for the &#8220;Subscribe&#8221; link on the main page for about 10 seconds, click it. Another popup appears. This is becoming annoying. Since Firefox has a pretty clever popup blocker, this indicates that the WSJ webmaster team spent some time devising this even more clever popup script to get around my popup blocker &#8212; despite the fact that I obviously hate popups.</p>
<p>I am determined, however, so I close the second popup, and start filling out the form. I don&#8217;t remember exactly how or when, but a third popup appears.</p>
<p>I stop filling out the form and close the window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurence haughton</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-new-wsj/comment-page-1/#comment-1836</link>
		<dc:creator>laurence haughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2999#comment-1836</guid>
		<description>I think the WSJ has to worry more about its content.  I find every day I can take &#039;em or leave &#039;em.  That&#039;s should be the biggest fear of every content provider - clients who are indifferent.

A Brit J school professor wrote last September &quot;financial journalists are too tied up in mutual back-scratching with companies and, they are too economically illiterate.&quot;  That&#039;s another couple of reasons I can do without the WSJ.  I see a lot of both in their pages.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the WSJ has to worry more about its content.  I find every day I can take &#8216;em or leave &#8216;em.  That&#8217;s should be the biggest fear of every content provider &#8211; clients who are indifferent.</p>
<p>A Brit J school professor wrote last September &#8220;financial journalists are too tied up in mutual back-scratching with companies and, they are too economically illiterate.&#8221;  That&#8217;s another couple of reasons I can do without the WSJ.  I see a lot of both in their pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

