<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Power of Quality Content:  Why the WSJ Gives Me Warm Fuzzies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/the-power-of-quality-content-why-the-wsj-gives-me-warm-fuzzies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-power-of-quality-content-why-the-wsj-gives-me-warm-fuzzies/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin Zhivago</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-power-of-quality-content-why-the-wsj-gives-me-warm-fuzzies/comment-page-1/#comment-2074</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin Zhivago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3088#comment-2074</guid>
		<description>I think what I get from the WSJ is the story behind the story. Not in all cases, but in enough cases to make it worth the read. It&#039;s not like so many articles, where you read it, find it somewhat interesting, then realize you can&#039;t possibly apply it to your own situation. With the Wall, I usually find one story or more per issue that gives me some insight I can apply. Actually I subscribe to both the online and paper versions, and find that I read the paper version while traveling and the online version at work. Great site, by the way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what I get from the WSJ is the story behind the story. Not in all cases, but in enough cases to make it worth the read. It&#8217;s not like so many articles, where you read it, find it somewhat interesting, then realize you can&#8217;t possibly apply it to your own situation. With the Wall, I usually find one story or more per issue that gives me some insight I can apply. Actually I subscribe to both the online and paper versions, and find that I read the paper version while traveling and the online version at work. Great site, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Jusko</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-power-of-quality-content-why-the-wsj-gives-me-warm-fuzzies/comment-page-1/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Jusko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3088#comment-2073</guid>
		<description>Have avoided the WSJ in the past because the right-wing editorials don&#039;t jibe with my politics, but gave in and subscribed recently when I found so many articles I wanted to read referred to by other news sites or blog posts.  It&#039;s been worth the money in my opinion. I also prefer the paper.  Got the online subscription, too, but I think I wasted $ there as I don&#039;t think I&#039;ll ever read it online.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have avoided the WSJ in the past because the right-wing editorials don&#8217;t jibe with my politics, but gave in and subscribed recently when I found so many articles I wanted to read referred to by other news sites or blog posts.  It&#8217;s been worth the money in my opinion. I also prefer the paper.  Got the online subscription, too, but I think I wasted $ there as I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ll ever read it online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wally Bock</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-power-of-quality-content-why-the-wsj-gives-me-warm-fuzzies/comment-page-1/#comment-2072</link>
		<dc:creator>Wally Bock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3088#comment-2072</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve maintained electronic clipping files in a sweet little program called AskSAM for several years.  Last summer in my semi-annual review time, I did a little study of which
publications generated the most articles that I thought were worth keeping.  Note that business news is one of my passions, but leadership/management/supervision in all forms is a passion and so are books.  Two publications accounted for about 60 percent of my clippings all by themselves They were the Journal and the New York Times. Close to them was The Economist.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve maintained electronic clipping files in a sweet little program called AskSAM for several years.  Last summer in my semi-annual review time, I did a little study of which<br />
publications generated the most articles that I thought were worth keeping.  Note that business news is one of my passions, but leadership/management/supervision in all forms is a passion and so are books.  Two publications accounted for about 60 percent of my clippings all by themselves They were the Journal and the New York Times. Close to them was The Economist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shuchetana</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-power-of-quality-content-why-the-wsj-gives-me-warm-fuzzies/comment-page-1/#comment-2071</link>
		<dc:creator>shuchetana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3088#comment-2071</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob! I don&#039;t subscriber to WSJ, but I&#039;m pretty convinced by this, and another previous mention of yours, to start. Is the same content available on the web?
I&#039;d also like to mention how much I like your blog. I&#039;m a typical shy lurker, but a post (on another blog) about how much bloggers appreciate comments, convinced me to let you know that this is one of my favorite blogs :) Don&#039;t retire, i love your refreshing and honest perspective.
O, and do you read the Economist? That&#039;s my current read--weekly, global and reasonably indepth.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob! I don&#8217;t subscriber to WSJ, but I&#8217;m pretty convinced by this, and another previous mention of yours, to start. Is the same content available on the web?<br />
I&#8217;d also like to mention how much I like your blog. I&#8217;m a typical shy lurker, but a post (on another blog) about how much bloggers appreciate comments, convinced me to let you know that this is one of my favorite blogs <img src='http://www.businesspundit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Don&#8217;t retire, i love your refreshing and honest perspective.<br />
O, and do you read the Economist? That&#8217;s my current read&#8211;weekly, global and reasonably indepth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-power-of-quality-content-why-the-wsj-gives-me-warm-fuzzies/comment-page-1/#comment-2070</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3088#comment-2070</guid>
		<description>My point of view has always been that brands are more important now than ever.  What has changed is the way those brands are crafted to achieve the emotional connection with their core audience.  With publications, their content is truly their relevant differentiating benefit -- it is what makes the WSJ resonate in your (and my) mind in a way that others in the space just can&#039;t touch.  And I too just reupped my subscription last week for many of the same reasons you did.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point of view has always been that brands are more important now than ever.  What has changed is the way those brands are crafted to achieve the emotional connection with their core audience.  With publications, their content is truly their relevant differentiating benefit &#8212; it is what makes the WSJ resonate in your (and my) mind in a way that others in the space just can&#8217;t touch.  And I too just reupped my subscription last week for many of the same reasons you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libby</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-power-of-quality-content-why-the-wsj-gives-me-warm-fuzzies/comment-page-1/#comment-2069</link>
		<dc:creator>Libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3088#comment-2069</guid>
		<description>The Wall Street Journal is my favorite paper because it does things right.  Yes, I love business news, but it&#039;s also about the original content and investigative reporting that few other newspapers seem to do anymore.  Content is king!  I don&#039;t need to read about stuff that happened yesterday and has already been repeated about 100 times by the time the newspaper arrives.  Like I wrote on my blog www.impleader.com, papers must provide what readers can&#039;t get elsewhere, not another rehash of stale news.  The WSJ does this and the recent changes have made the paper much better in my opinion.  Now, it&#039;s easy to hold, easier to find continuing stories, and there&#039;s less of the general news everyone already knows.  Great job!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal is my favorite paper because it does things right.  Yes, I love business news, but it&#8217;s also about the original content and investigative reporting that few other newspapers seem to do anymore.  Content is king!  I don&#8217;t need to read about stuff that happened yesterday and has already been repeated about 100 times by the time the newspaper arrives.  Like I wrote on my blog <a href="http://www.impleader.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.impleader.com</a>, papers must provide what readers can&#8217;t get elsewhere, not another rehash of stale news.  The WSJ does this and the recent changes have made the paper much better in my opinion.  Now, it&#8217;s easy to hold, easier to find continuing stories, and there&#8217;s less of the general news everyone already knows.  Great job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd S.</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-power-of-quality-content-why-the-wsj-gives-me-warm-fuzzies/comment-page-1/#comment-2068</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 05:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3088#comment-2068</guid>
		<description>You do know someone else who subscribes to the Wall Street Journal.  I read it every day.  Some days I find things.  Other days I don&#039;t.  The reason I read it is for the randomness what what they will bring him.  Blogs play off the popular and controversial.

WSJ gives me depth behind some of the big things going on.  Their coverage of health care in the last year has been stellar.  Add to that the backdating scandal that they first uncovered.

Everyone in business should read it every day.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do know someone else who subscribes to the Wall Street Journal.  I read it every day.  Some days I find things.  Other days I don&#8217;t.  The reason I read it is for the randomness what what they will bring him.  Blogs play off the popular and controversial.</p>
<p>WSJ gives me depth behind some of the big things going on.  Their coverage of health care in the last year has been stellar.  Add to that the backdating scandal that they first uncovered.</p>
<p>Everyone in business should read it every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Woodruff</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/the-power-of-quality-content-why-the-wsj-gives-me-warm-fuzzies/comment-page-1/#comment-2067</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Woodruff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 01:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3088#comment-2067</guid>
		<description>I know exactly what you mean. It started with the Friday edition, because of the wine column. Then I&#039;d occasionally get other editions. Finally I started subscribing and go into withdrawals if I don&#039;t have my fix. For the very same reasons that you&#039;ve mentioned, plus the fact that there are interesting stories all the time that I wouldn&#039;t necessarily come across by a targeted news search.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know exactly what you mean. It started with the Friday edition, because of the wine column. Then I&#8217;d occasionally get other editions. Finally I started subscribing and go into withdrawals if I don&#8217;t have my fix. For the very same reasons that you&#8217;ve mentioned, plus the fact that there are interesting stories all the time that I wouldn&#8217;t necessarily come across by a targeted news search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

