<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time Warner Prepares to Spin Off AOL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/time-warner-prepares-to-spin-off-aol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/time-warner-prepares-to-spin-off-aol/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam G. Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/time-warner-prepares-to-spin-off-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-13835</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam G. Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=10412#comment-13835</guid>
		<description>I remember when AOL merged (bought?) Time Warner and thought to myself how this was going to end badly.  AOL was on the verge of losing a substantial amount of business because people realized they did not need AOL to get to the internet.  There were far better ways.  If AOL got rid of that client of theirs and focused on better content, it would have been a different story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when AOL merged (bought?) Time Warner and thought to myself how this was going to end badly.  AOL was on the verge of losing a substantial amount of business because people realized they did not need AOL to get to the internet.  There were far better ways.  If AOL got rid of that client of theirs and focused on better content, it would have been a different story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/time-warner-prepares-to-spin-off-aol/comment-page-1/#comment-13833</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com/?p=10412#comment-13833</guid>
		<description>kind of funny.  AOL uses its dot-com era cash to buy TimeWarner, then promptly moves their name to the end.  Now they are trying to decide whether to rid themselves of the aging icon that gave them the cash in the first place (AOL) or one of the giants of the rapidly fading print industry (Time).
It is probably to late to rehabilitate AOL into a portal to TimeWarner&#039;s online media (a la go.com), so they&#039;re better off without that one.
They should also keep the online media of Time and spin off a boutique printing company to serve those who still want their dead tree edition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kind of funny.  AOL uses its dot-com era cash to buy TimeWarner, then promptly moves their name to the end.  Now they are trying to decide whether to rid themselves of the aging icon that gave them the cash in the first place (AOL) or one of the giants of the rapidly fading print industry (Time).<br />
It is probably to late to rehabilitate AOL into a portal to TimeWarner&#8217;s online media (a la go.com), so they&#8217;re better off without that one.<br />
They should also keep the online media of Time and spin off a boutique printing company to serve those who still want their dead tree edition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

