<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two New Search Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/two-new-search-engines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/two-new-search-engines/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:54:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/two-new-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-2331</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 19:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3187#comment-2331</guid>
		<description>You might not like Google, but I&#039;ll tell you right now that these two search engines you mention here aren&#039;t doing a better job. One of my sites is a very authentic info portal in the midst of GAME CENTRAL, ie. every single possible keyword that I rank well on has had its corresponding domain bought and pumped, no matter how useless the site actually is. Google sees these sites and knows their real value is low. Hakia and Mahalo both seem to really like these gamed up lame ass sites, so my vote stays with Google.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might not like Google, but I&#8217;ll tell you right now that these two search engines you mention here aren&#8217;t doing a better job. One of my sites is a very authentic info portal in the midst of GAME CENTRAL, ie. every single possible keyword that I rank well on has had its corresponding domain bought and pumped, no matter how useless the site actually is. Google sees these sites and knows their real value is low. Hakia and Mahalo both seem to really like these gamed up lame ass sites, so my vote stays with Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken King &#124; King Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/two-new-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-2330</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken King &#124; King Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 13:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3187#comment-2330</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t Rule #1 of PageRank that you can&#039;t talk about PageRank?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Rule #1 of PageRank that you can&#8217;t talk about PageRank?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaz</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/two-new-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-2329</link>
		<dc:creator>shaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 02:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3187#comment-2329</guid>
		<description>im not liking google more and more aswell they seem to be very bossy
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im not liking google more and more aswell they seem to be very bossy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/two-new-search-engines/comment-page-1/#comment-2328</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 19:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3187#comment-2328</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing these out.  Alternatives always come in handy.  If these are successful in weeding out some of the garbage, how useful would that be!  Realistically, there is nothing worse than finding 375,992 search results.  I posted these to my blog also(http://accountinghelpdesk.blogspot.com/).  Hopefully others will try these out also.
John
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing these out.  Alternatives always come in handy.  If these are successful in weeding out some of the garbage, how useful would that be!  Realistically, there is nothing worse than finding 375,992 search results.  I posted these to my blog also(http://accountinghelpdesk.blogspot.com/).  Hopefully others will try these out also.<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
