<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Make Money the Old-fashioned Way:  Confidence Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/we-make-money-the-old-fashioned-way-confidence-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/we-make-money-the-old-fashioned-way-confidence-work/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill alpert</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/we-make-money-the-old-fashioned-way-confidence-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2093</link>
		<dc:creator>bill alpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3097#comment-2093</guid>
		<description>Laurence:

Should you pay attention to more than the WSJ and CNBC ? Well...everyone should subscribe to Barron&#039;s -- it costs something like $75 bucks in addition to the WSJ Online subscription, or some such price (I&#039;ve never paid for it in my life, as they say).  Yahoo and I think Google link to stories in Barron&#039;s and other subscription sites, giving you a heads up, even if you have to pay to see stories.  If a Barron&#039;s story is suffiently influential on a stock price, it usually gets pasted by someone onto a message board (to the consternation of our copyright and reprint people).

I pay attention to the WSJ, the DJ Newswires (costs money), Barron&#039;s, the New York Times and less frequently Fortune, Forbes, Reuters, Bloomberg...

Bill Alpert
Barron&#039;s
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurence:</p>
<p>Should you pay attention to more than the WSJ and CNBC ? Well&#8230;everyone should subscribe to Barron&#8217;s &#8212; it costs something like $75 bucks in addition to the WSJ Online subscription, or some such price (I&#8217;ve never paid for it in my life, as they say).  Yahoo and I think Google link to stories in Barron&#8217;s and other subscription sites, giving you a heads up, even if you have to pay to see stories.  If a Barron&#8217;s story is suffiently influential on a stock price, it usually gets pasted by someone onto a message board (to the consternation of our copyright and reprint people).</p>
<p>I pay attention to the WSJ, the DJ Newswires (costs money), Barron&#8217;s, the New York Times and less frequently Fortune, Forbes, Reuters, Bloomberg&#8230;</p>
<p>Bill Alpert<br />
Barron&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Mathers</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/we-make-money-the-old-fashioned-way-confidence-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2092</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Mathers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3097#comment-2092</guid>
		<description>I have an article on my blog that deals with ethics. To see it go to:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://jerkyd.blogspot.com/2006/12/ethics-of-jerky-direct.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://jerkyd.blogspot.com/2006/12/ethics-of-jerky-direct.html&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an article on my blog that deals with ethics. To see it go to:<br />
<a href="http://jerkyd.blogspot.com/2006/12/ethics-of-jerky-direct.html" rel="nofollow">http://jerkyd.blogspot.com/2006/12/ethics-of-jerky-direct.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurence haughton</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/we-make-money-the-old-fashioned-way-confidence-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2091</link>
		<dc:creator>laurence haughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3097#comment-2091</guid>
		<description>There are only so many hours in a day Bill.  Are you saying I should switch my sources for business news?  What do you recommend?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are only so many hours in a day Bill.  Are you saying I should switch my sources for business news?  What do you recommend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/we-make-money-the-old-fashioned-way-confidence-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2090</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 04:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3097#comment-2090</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill,

Good for you and your colleagues!  I  know Rob is partial to WSJ, but if they fumbled this story (particularly in light of the backtesting angle), that&#039;s a no-no.  Of course, since they&#039;re mentioned in the paper, there could be other explanations.

Thanks for commenting,

Mike
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,</p>
<p>Good for you and your colleagues!  I  know Rob is partial to WSJ, but if they fumbled this story (particularly in light of the backtesting angle), that&#8217;s a no-no.  Of course, since they&#8217;re mentioned in the paper, there could be other explanations.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting,</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Alpert</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/we-make-money-the-old-fashioned-way-confidence-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2089</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Alpert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3097#comment-2089</guid>
		<description>At Barron&#039;s, we&#039;ve done a lot of reporting on this mess. Either our news judgement stinks or you can&#039;t rely only on the WSJ and CNBC.

Bill Alpert
Barron&#039;s
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Barron&#8217;s, we&#8217;ve done a lot of reporting on this mess. Either our news judgement stinks or you can&#8217;t rely only on the WSJ and CNBC.</p>
<p>Bill Alpert<br />
Barron&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/we-make-money-the-old-fashioned-way-confidence-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2088</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 23:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3097#comment-2088</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t watch a lot of TV.  I saw it on several blogs, including Instapundit and  The Big Picture, so I figured other media would have covered it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t watch a lot of TV.  I saw it on several blogs, including Instapundit and  The Big Picture, so I figured other media would have covered it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurence haughton</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/we-make-money-the-old-fashioned-way-confidence-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2087</link>
		<dc:creator>laurence haughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=3097#comment-2087</guid>
		<description>I keep CNBC on all the time and read the WSJ every day.  I haven&#039;t heard or seen anything about this scandal.  Has it been widely reported?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep CNBC on all the time and read the WSJ every day.  I haven&#8217;t heard or seen anything about this scandal.  Has it been widely reported?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

