Comments on: What Would a Sarah Palin Economy Look Like?

By: NashEntLaw

NashEntLaw — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:24:14 +0000

Thor:
(A) Commenting on a 13-month old article? (I got pinged because of my earlier comment and am likely the only one who will read your post)

(B) Point to a single (legitimate) authority suggesting that there has been “no recorded increase in temperatures since 2000.” Even if it were true (it’s not), justify how such a micro analysis supports your position when the primary argument against global warming is that scientists take too short of a view of global history?

(C) Point to a single (legitimate) authority that disputes the impact of CO2 on the environment, or that the rise in CO2 is not mainly attributable to man.

(D) No one in the U.S. believes that it can change the progression of global warming on its own, though no one (including oil companies) disputes the amount of emissions we generate from fossil fuels relative to the rest of the world, China excluded.

(E) Seriously, do you believe what you write? How competent do you genuinely feel regarding your research skills and knowledge of the subject matter? We can debate politics and business strategy all day but at some point you have to accept that not all things are debatable. To 99.9% of the world, you sound completely ridiculous.

By: Thor

Thor — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:20:44 +0000

Hmmmmmmm. Worldwide there has been no recorded increase in temperatures since 2000. We are talking about weather monitoring stations monitored by various governments with different agendas so the glacial situation is not global warming. Also, believing that the US alone can change what mother nature is arrogant. What about that evil CO2? A minute portion of 1% of gases? Somebody picked the wrong poster child. The truth hurts sometimes–huh!

By: Ana

Ana — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 02:15:04 +0000

I bet Sarah Palin looks at porn when her husband’s not around.

By: Someone in the Universe

Someone in the Universe — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:32:04 +0000

Even thougb many people actaully would vote for Obama in an election, Sarah Palin gets more media attention.
I remember reading this somewhere:

“Palin is slowly overshadowing her running mate. Pretty soon, it will be ‘McCain? McCain who?’”

By: NoSarahPalin

NoSarahPalin — Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:04:29 +0000

I just heard Bill O’Reilly say that the “economic crisis will be the end of President Bush’s legacy”

Am I hearing things?

http://nosarahpalin.blogspot.com

By: Ryan

Ryan — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:37:20 +0000

Ok. I'm more than willing to admit it. I even said to my wife that the main reason people are enamored with Sarah Palin is that Sarah Palin is hot. What better than a sexy, photogenic politician who's attractive enough to hit the cover of Vogue and tough enough to shoot a gun and skin a moose?

By: Lela Davidson

Lela Davidson — Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:46:08 +0000

It’s the plastic surgery lobby..

By: Drea

Drea — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 17:17:41 +0000

I saw the speech last night too. Politics aside again, her whole family is gorgeous! Come to think of it, Cindy McCain is quite the looker too. So is Obama’s family. Could this year be bringing us some of the most attractive political families we’ve seen in a long time?

By: Lela

Lela — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:50:05 +0000

Okay, after watching the speech I’m adding a to the list:
- a huge boost to all things cosmetic and surgical. Regardless what you think of her politics, the woman is gorgeous and if she’s our ‘role model’ then we’ve all got a lot of maintenance to do! Notice tongue firmly in cheek – maybe someday I’ll give you a peek at Obamanomics…

By: Ryan

Ryan — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:02:31 +0000

Love all the complainer compliments. It’s as if there is a strict law of separation between state and economy. Pundits on any topic, no less business, are allowed to have political preferences. Since when was there a rule against that? Especially when politicians make policies with consequences for business and the economy.