<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Working in Serial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.businesspundit.com/working-in-serial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/working-in-serial/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneurship, Startup Companies and Business Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:54:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/working-in-serial/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2564#comment-632</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that my point was that we think in serial, but rather than we should work in serial;)  I agree with you on the thought process and its an interesting thought, but deals more with concentration than task accomplishment;)

As far as having to deal with multiple task, agreed.  However, you don&#039;t have to work on multiple tasks at once.  I&#039;m in sales, and I am I am fairly successful;)  Being able to juggle multiple tasks has nothing to do with accomplishing tasks in a serial fashion, in my humble opinion.  Each and everytime I try to type an email on one subject and talk on the phone on another, I do a poor job, and I don&#039;t give either job the necessary attention that they deserve.

I set my priorities and I follow them.  Why on earth would I want to divert attention to a low priority item, while I am working on a high priority item?  I&#039;d much rather do both right (the first time) and but rather take them on in a vertical line, rather than a horizontal one.

Just my thoughts (which are rarely right, and even less listened to;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that my point was that we think in serial, but rather than we should work in serial;)  I agree with you on the thought process and its an interesting thought, but deals more with concentration than task accomplishment;)</p>
<p>As far as having to deal with multiple task, agreed.  However, you don&#8217;t have to work on multiple tasks at once.  I&#8217;m in sales, and I am I am fairly successful;)  Being able to juggle multiple tasks has nothing to do with accomplishing tasks in a serial fashion, in my humble opinion.  Each and everytime I try to type an email on one subject and talk on the phone on another, I do a poor job, and I don&#8217;t give either job the necessary attention that they deserve.</p>
<p>I set my priorities and I follow them.  Why on earth would I want to divert attention to a low priority item, while I am working on a high priority item?  I&#8217;d much rather do both right (the first time) and but rather take them on in a vertical line, rather than a horizontal one.</p>
<p>Just my thoughts (which are rarely right, and even less listened to;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Tudor</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/working-in-serial/comment-page-1/#comment-631</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Tudor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2564#comment-631</guid>
		<description>Entrepreneurs and salespeople have to deal with multiple tasks on a daily basis.  Those that do it well prosper, because both types of efforts naturally reward those who can take responsibility for their actions and those never-ending &quot;to do&quot; lists.  Those that can&#039;t handle the responsibility will fail.

Multi-tasking, once something to marvel at by those who could somehow juggle all those balls in the air without letting the drop, is no commonplace.  It&#039;s expected of those who hope to succeed in today&#039;s business and sales environment.  We talk about that subject a lot at www.landingthedeal.com and its a constant source of debate, but I think its obvious that in today&#039;s world you have to have the ability to multi-task.

Great thought provoking post...thanks!  I&#039;m going to comment on my blog and post back to you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entrepreneurs and salespeople have to deal with multiple tasks on a daily basis.  Those that do it well prosper, because both types of efforts naturally reward those who can take responsibility for their actions and those never-ending &#8220;to do&#8221; lists.  Those that can&#8217;t handle the responsibility will fail.</p>
<p>Multi-tasking, once something to marvel at by those who could somehow juggle all those balls in the air without letting the drop, is no commonplace.  It&#8217;s expected of those who hope to succeed in today&#8217;s business and sales environment.  We talk about that subject a lot at <a href="http://www.landingthedeal.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.landingthedeal.com</a> and its a constant source of debate, but I think its obvious that in today&#8217;s world you have to have the ability to multi-task.</p>
<p>Great thought provoking post&#8230;thanks!  I&#8217;m going to comment on my blog and post back to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laurence haughton</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/working-in-serial/comment-page-1/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>laurence haughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2564#comment-630</guid>
		<description>Good point David.

But besides creating a stronger impression (very important) and gaining situational trust (also important) if you focus instead of fidgeting you are more likely to comprehend what&#039;s being said and what it means.

As hard as it is to imagine when someone tells you, &quot;You just don&#039;t understand!&quot; you pRobably don&#039;t.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point David.</p>
<p>But besides creating a stronger impression (very important) and gaining situational trust (also important) if you focus instead of fidgeting you are more likely to comprehend what&#8217;s being said and what it means.</p>
<p>As hard as it is to imagine when someone tells you, &#8220;You just don&#8217;t understand!&#8221; you pRobably don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Foster</title>
		<link>http://www.businesspundit.com/working-in-serial/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>David Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businesspundit.com.php5-6.websitetestlink.com/?p=2564#comment-629</guid>
		<description>There is another advantage to serialization: if the task involves dealing with another human being, face to face, you will create a much stronger impression if you visibly focus entirely on the conversation, without fiddling with your Blackberry or whatever.

I suspect virtually all human thought is serialized at some level; the question is, what level? Do you jump around in 3-second chunks, 3-minute chunks, or 30-minute chunks? There are pRobably significant individual differences in what works best, but social pressures today encourage the 3-second mode even for those who are better off with a longer time quantum...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is another advantage to serialization: if the task involves dealing with another human being, face to face, you will create a much stronger impression if you visibly focus entirely on the conversation, without fiddling with your Blackberry or whatever.</p>
<p>I suspect virtually all human thought is serialized at some level; the question is, what level? Do you jump around in 3-second chunks, 3-minute chunks, or 30-minute chunks? There are pRobably significant individual differences in what works best, but social pressures today encourage the 3-second mode even for those who are better off with a longer time quantum&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
