National Debt vs. National Deficit

Print This Post Print This Post   Email This Post Email This Post   Tweet This  ADD TO DEL.ICIO.US Save Post  ADD TO STUMBLEUPON 

 

SqueakyMarmotFlickr

Sorry to insult the intelligence of a few very smart folks out there, but considering the vast amount of financial news we’re digesting every day, I thought a refresher on the national debt and the national deficit was in order. If you’ve been confused by these terms, you’re in good company. I read a newspaper article last week that used the meanings of these two very different things interchangeably. So what are they?

What is the National Debt?

The national debt is the total amount of money owed by the US Federal Government to creditors who hold US Debt instruments (like Treasury Bills and Savings Bonds). It includes all federal debt held by states, corporations, individuals and *this is the kicker* foreign governments. Yes, you heard right. We borrow money from other countries’ governments to finance our own. Which really means that we’re borrowing from their citizens to pay for programs for our citizens. It’s a head scratcher I know. By the way, that doesn’t even include the amounts we’ve promised to pay out for Medicaid, Social Security, and Medicare.

The National Debt is also known as the public debt or the government debt.

Now that we’re clear on debt, let’s move on to that other D word.

What is the National Deficit?

The National Deficit is a budget deficit of the federal government. If the government drew up a spreadsheet and subtracted all the expenses from all the income, they’d come up short. The amount of this shortfall is the national deficit. They spends more money than they earn. So, just like you do when you really, really, really want those Jimmy Choos, or the cool new bike, or the newest iPhone, the federal government takes out a loan. Where you use plastic, the government uses Treasury Bills and Savings Bonds. And this brings us back to debt. As deficits accumulate, they must be financed. That’s where the confusion with the terminology sets in.

I hope this shines a little sunshine your daily stroll through the financial press!





Subscribe

Comments

  1. dobbsfox's Gravatar Comment by dobbsfox on November 3rd, 2008 at 11:13 am

    Thanks for this informative (if somewhat patronizing) post.

  2. Lela's Gravatar Comment by Lela on November 3rd, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    Didn’t mean to be patronizing. It just all gets jumbled together sometimes.

  3. Shamsher Singh Mann's Gravatar Comment by Shamsher Singh Mann on March 24th, 2009 at 12:14 am

    Nice one. Short and sweet.

  4. Sissy Willis's Gravatar Comment by Sissy Willis on April 13th, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    Thank you very much! Very clear and elucidating for us financial illiterates out here. :-) I found you in a google search, by the way.

  5. joe stafura's Gravatar Comment by joe stafura on June 29th, 2009 at 2:10 pm

    The analogy that most online “experts” like to use, comparing a household budget to the governments budget, is incorrect.

    It is easy to see why they do it, it is simple and appeals to populist outrage, it is yet another embarrassing legacy of the conservative movement.

    Comparing buying a pair of Jimmy Choo’s or and iPhone to the operating budget of a country or even a company for that matter shows how little personal wealth advisors know about economics.

    So the next time you are tempted to pay someone for “manage your money” stop for a minute and read some of the nonsense that gets spouted by these guys, don’t pay them 2% or $100 an hour to spend your money unless they guarantee results. They won’t do that so you can do just as well with an index fund or some bonds.

Leave a Reply